Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Franks v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 718 P.2d 193.

31 citing documents.

Torres v. Jai Dining Services Ariz. 2023
Torres v. Jai Dining Services Ariz. 2023
Co., –300 (App. 1985) (extending anti-abrogation clause protection to the tort of bad faith, although this cause of action was not recognized until 1981).
Gradis v. Banner Health Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Gradis v. Banner Health Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
¶12 Gradis argues that Franks v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., supports her contention that acts by a self- insured employer in handling a worker's compensation claim do not arise out of the employment relationship.
Merkens v. Federal Insurance 349 P.3d 1111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Merkens v. Federal Insurance 349 P.3d 1111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
See Franks v. U.S. Fidelity & Guarantee Co., P.2d 193 (App. 1985); Boy v. Fremont Indem.
Mendoza v. McDonald's Corp. 213 P.3d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Mendoza v. McDonald's Corp. 213 P.3d 288 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
¶ 31 In Franks v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., , we recognized bad faith is a separate tort, and not a direct or natural consequence of a compensable workers’ compensation injury.
Rowland v. Great States Insurance 20 P.3d 1158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Rowland v. Great States Insurance 20 P.3d 1158 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Co., -97 , -99 (App.1985).
Bills v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 984 P.2d 574 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
Bills v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund 984 P.2d 574 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
Co., , cf. Hayes v. Continental Ins.
Unique Equipment Co. v. TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc. 3 P.3d 970 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Unique Equipment Co. v. TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc. 3 P.3d 970 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Co., , (action for bad faith against employer’s compensation carrier not barred)).
Stoecker v. Brush Wellman, Inc. 984 P.2d 534 Ariz. 1999
Stoecker v. Brush Wellman, Inc. 984 P.2d 534 Ariz. 1999
Co., , (employee’s bad faith action against employer’s compensation carrier not barred because exclusivity doctrine applies only to injuries covered by Act).
Hayes v. Continental Insurance 872 P.2d 668 Ariz. 1994
Hayes v. Continental Insurance 872 P.2d 668 Ariz. 1994
Hazine v. Montgomery Elevator Co. 861 P.2d 625 Ariz. 1993
Hazine v. Montgomery Elevator Co. 861 P.2d 625 Ariz. 1993
Co., -300 , -02 (App.1985) (art. 18, § 6 applies to tort of bad faith, although bad faith cause of action not recognized until 1981).
Hays v. Continental Insurance 838 P.2d 1334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Hays v. Continental Insurance 838 P.2d 1334 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Plaintiff cites Franks v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, , for the proposition that the cause of action for bad faith was recognized at common law and is therefore protected by art. 18, § 6.
Dietz v. General Electric Co. 821 P.2d 166 Ariz. 1991
Dietz v. General Electric Co. 821 P.2d 166 Ariz. 1991
1954 , 95 L.Ed.2d 527 (1987); Barrio v. San Manuel Division Hospital, Magma Copper, , , Franks v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Argonaut Insurance v. Lyons 766 P.2d 619 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Argonaut Insurance v. Lyons 766 P.2d 619 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Franks v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Boy v. Fremont Indemnity Co. 742 P.2d 835 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Boy v. Fremont Indemnity Co. 742 P.2d 835 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
In Franks v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., , we said “[a] claim by an injured employee against the workers’ compensation carrier is a first-party claim, ...
Ford v. Revlon, Inc. 734 P.2d 580 Ariz. 1987
Osborn v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 725 P.2d 725 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Osborn v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 725 P.2d 725 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Such an analysis would also require us to consider the majority and dissenting opinions in Franks v. USF & G