Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite FLOOD CONTROL DIST. OF MARICOPA CTY. v. Conlin, 712 P.2d 979.

50 citing documents.

In Re Term of Parental Rights as to M.K. and M.K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
In Re Term of Parental Rights as to M.K. and M.K. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Ekberg v. M-14p Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Ekberg v. M-14p Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
De Leon v. Pizarro, Sr. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
De Leon v. Pizarro, Sr. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Cordero v. Hazlitt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Cordero v. Hazlitt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Rea v. Garza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Rea v. Garza Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Fernandez Living Trust v. Ripps Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Fernandez Living Trust v. Ripps Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Shafer v. Walgreen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Shafer v. Walgreen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
v. Conlin, Joel Erik Thompson, ¶ 20 (App. 1998).
Demario v. Demario Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Demario v. Demario Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
(appellate court will disregard statements of fact that lack appropriate citation to the record and are not supported by the record); see also ARCAP 13(a)(7).
Wootton v. Blair Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Wootton v. Blair Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Tutora v. Dominguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Tutora v. Dominguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Holland v. Hurley 212 P.3d 890 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Holland v. Hurley 212 P.3d 890 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Gravel Resources of Arizona v. Hills 170 P.3d 282 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Gravel Resources of Arizona v. Hills 170 P.3d 282 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Grace Howard Allen v. Ades and T.S.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Grace Howard Allen v. Ades and T.S.A. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
We have therefore disregarded Allen’s statement of facts, and have instead relied on the Arizona Department of Economic Security’s statement of facts and our review of the record.
Primary Consultants, L.L.C. v. Maricopa County Recorder 111 P.3d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Primary Consultants, L.L.C. v. Maricopa County Recorder 111 P.3d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
(county flood control district is not an entity within the meaning of “state” as used in § 12-348).
Hart v. Seven Resorts Inc. 947 P.2d 846 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Hart v. Seven Resorts Inc. 947 P.2d 846 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Ziegelbauer v. Ziegelbauer 942 P.2d 472 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Ziegelbauer v. Ziegelbauer 942 P.2d 472 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
We therefore disregard it, , and summarize the facts from the record and the answering brief.
Matter of Estate of Killen 937 P.2d 1368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
M.I. Marshall & Ilsley Trust Co. v. McCannon 937 P.2d 1368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
M.I. Marshall & Ilsley Trust Co. v. McCannon 937 P.2d 1368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Matter of Estate of Killen 937 P.2d 1368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Matter of Guardianship of Kelly 910 P.2d 665 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Matter of Guardianship of Kelly 910 P.2d 665 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Lansford v. Harris 850 P.2d 126 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Lansford v. Harris 850 P.2d 126 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Semple v. Tri-City Drywall, Inc. 838 P.2d 1369 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Semple v. Tri-City Drywall, Inc. 838 P.2d 1369 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Bird v. State Through Corbin 821 P.2d 287 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Bird v. State Through Corbin 821 P.2d 287 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Maricopa County v. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District No. 1 830 P.2d 846 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Maricopa County v. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District No. 1 830 P.2d 846 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
(district is not an entity that may be required to pay attorneys' fees under A.R.S.
Hays v. Fischer 777 P.2d 222 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Distinguished Hays v. Fischer 777 P.2d 222 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State v. Sinclair 768 P.2d 655 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State v. Sinclair 768 P.2d 655 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988