Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Anson v. American Motors Corp., 747 P.2d 581.

73 citing documents.

Shamamian v. Davis Miles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Shamamian v. Davis Miles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Motors Corp., –28 (App. 1987).
Chatha v. Marwah Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Chatha v. Marwah Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Cavness v. Cavness-Engstrand Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Cavness v. Cavness-Engstrand Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
JANE HM DOE v. THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH OF THE DIOCESE OF PHOENIX Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
JANE HM DOE v. THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH OF THE DIOCESE OF PHOENIX Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2023
(once raised court must resolve whether, in light of tolling claim, “plaintiff will not be entitled to relief under any set of facts susceptible of proof under the claims stated”).
Schirmer v. Avalon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Schirmer v. Avalon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Rep Custom v. McBride Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Rep Custom v. McBride Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Fitzhugh v. Princeton Ins. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Fitzhugh v. Princeton Ins. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Isgro v. Wells Fargo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Isgro v. Wells Fargo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Motors Corp., (“In general, to toll the statute of limitations the fraud must prevent inquiry, elude investigation or mislead the party who claims the cause of action.”).
Wilson v. Drake Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Wilson v. Drake Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Motors Corp., (“Whether the appellees did in fact fraudulently conceal .
Whiles v. Henderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Whiles v. Henderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Coulter v. Grant Thornton, LLP 388 P.3d 834 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Coulter v. Grant Thornton, LLP 388 P.3d 834 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Motors Corp., see also Commercial Union Ins.
Viniegra v. Town of Parker Municipal Property Corp. 383 P.3d 665 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Viniegra v. Town of Parker Municipal Property Corp. 383 P.3d 665 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Motors Corp., (citation omitted).
Mattison v. Scottsdale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Mattison v. Scottsdale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Motors Corp., and Baden- Winterwood v. Life Time Fitness, 484 F. Supp. 2d 822, 826 (S.D.
Ader v. Estate of Felger 375 P.3d 97 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Ader v. Estate of Felger 375 P.3d 97 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Motors Corp., (under A.R.S.
Valenzuela v. Maricopa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Valenzuela v. Maricopa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Motors Corp., (noting the plaintiff carries the burden when a motion to dismiss establishes the claim is facially barred); see also Ariz. R. Civ.
Mayer Unified School and Gadsen Elementary School v. Winkleman, Az State Land Dept... Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Mayer Unified School and Gadsen Elementary School v. Winkleman, Az State Land Dept... Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
McCloud v. State of Arizona Dept. of Public Safety And Kimbro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
McCloud v. State of Arizona Dept. of Public Safety And Kimbro Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Brunet v. Murphy 135 P.3d 714 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Brunet v. Murphy 135 P.3d 714 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Motors Corp., , (A “cause of action does not ‘accrue’ until a plaintiff discovers or by the exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered that he or she has been injured by defendant’s negligent conduct.”) (citation omitted).
Douglas v. Governing Board of the Window Rock Consolidated School District No. 8 78 P.3d 1065 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Douglas v. Governing Board of the Window Rock Consolidated School District No. 8 78 P.3d 1065 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
Motors Corp., , , (Only if “it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief’ should a motion to dismiss be granted (citing 5A C. Wright &am
REPUBLIC NAT. BANK OF NY v. Pima County 25 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
REPUBLIC NAT. BANK OF NY v. Pima County 25 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
Stulce v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT 3 P.3d 1007 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Stulce v. SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT 3 P.3d 1007 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
See, , (accrual under two-year wrongful death statute of limitations).
Walters v. Maricopa County 990 P.2d 677 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Walters v. Maricopa County 990 P.2d 677 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Young v. City of Scottsdale 970 P.2d 942 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Young v. City of Scottsdale 970 P.2d 942 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Nolde v. Frankie 949 P.2d 511 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Doe v. Miles Inc. 945 P.2d 1304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Doe v. Miles Inc. 945 P.2d 1304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
In other words, “the claim is barred two years from when the plaintiff knew or should have known facts giving rise to the claim.”
Diaz v. Magma Copper Co. 950 P.2d 1165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997