Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Lewin v. Miller Wagner & Co., Ltd., 725 P.2d 736.

43 citing documents.

Linscott v. Heshion Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Linscott v. Heshion Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Lewin v. Miller Wagner & Co., Ltd., (“Generally, damages that are speculative, remote or uncertain may not form the basis of a judgment.”).
Wiltse v. Wiltse Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Wiltse v. Wiltse Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Corp., –92 (App. 1987) (discussing accountant malpractice); Lewin v. Miller Wagner & Co., –37 (1986) (same); –61 (1966) (discussing partnership accounting).
Sandoval v. Oxford Financial Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Sandoval v. Oxford Financial Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Id.; see also Lewin v. Miller Wagner & Co., (“[W]hile a contractual relationship may give rise to a duty to perform in accordance with a certain standard of care, this legally imposed duty exists separate and apart from the contract giving rise to the duty.
McA Financial Group, Ltd. v. Enterprise Bank & Trust 341 P.3d 1161 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Kamela v. One West Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
McA Financial Group, Ltd. v. Enterprise Bank & Trust 341 P.3d 1161 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
13 MCA FINANCIAL GROUP v. ENTERPRISE BANK & TRUST Opinion of the Court (App. 2006); see also Lewin v. Miller Wagner & Co., Ltd., (mere existence of contract does not justify fees award where contract only “peripherally involved in a cause of action”); In re Larry’s Apartment, L.L.C., 249 F.3d 832, 836 (9th Cir. 2001) (where contract “merely somewhere within the factual background,” fees under § 12–341.01(A) not awa
Kamela v. One West Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Lewin v. Miller Wagner & Co., ¶ 17, (a 5 KAMELA v. ONE WEST BANK Decision of the Court contract cannot merely be a factual predicate to the action, b
Covino v. Forrest Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Covino v. Forrest Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
See Lewin v. Miller Wagner & Co., -35, -42 (App. 1986).
Dooley Corvallas Development Corp. v. O'Brien 244 P.3d 586 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Dooley Corvallas Development Corp. v. O'Brien 244 P.3d 586 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
In Barmat , the court approved the view expressed in Lewin v. Miller Wagner & Co., Ltd., , that “where the implied contract does no more than place the parties in a relationship in which the law then imposes certain duties recognized by public policy, the gravamen of the subsequent action for breach is tort, not contract.” Barmat, 155 Ariz. at 523 , 747 P.2d at 1222 .
Keystone Floor & More, LLC v. Arizona Registrar of Contractors 219 P.3d 237 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Keystone Floor & More, LLC v. Arizona Registrar of Contractors 219 P.3d 237 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
See Lewin v. Miller Wagner & Co., Ltd.
Kaman Aerospace Corp. v. Arizona Board of Regents Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Kaman Aerospace Corp. v. Arizona Board of Regents Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
-19, 263 P. 584, 588-89 (1928); Bruce Church, -35, -32 (App. 1991); Lewin v. Miller Wagner & Co., -35, -42 (App. 1986).
Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc. 6 P.3d 315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc. 6 P.3d 315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
2 ¶24 The court in Barmat expressly approved the analysis of Lewin v. Miller Wagner & Co.
Schwab Sales, Inc. v. GN Const. Co., Inc. 992 P.2d 1128 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Schwab Sales, Inc. v. GN Const. Co., Inc. 992 P.2d 1128 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Lew-in v. Miller Wagner & Co., Ltd., , , 722 P,2d 983, 989 (App.1986) (claim arose from “breach of an independent duty inherent in the legal relationship created by the trial court’s order appointing” a receiver).
Collins v. Miller & Miller, Ltd. 943 P.2d 747 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Collins v. Miller & Miller, Ltd. 943 P.2d 747 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
*395 In Lewin v. Miller Wagner & Co., Ltd., , an action involving accountant malpractice, we faced the question “whether the failure to comport with the legally imposed standard of care also constitutes a breach of the employment agreement.” Id.
O'KEEFE v. Grenke 825 P.2d 985 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
O'KEEFE v. Grenke 825 P.2d 985 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Co., Inc., , , Lewin v. Miller Wagner & Co., Ltd., , Sanchez-O’
Bruce Church, Inc. v. United Farm Workers of America 816 P.2d 919 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Bruce Church, Inc. v. United Farm Workers of America 816 P.2d 919 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
See Lewin v. Miller Wagner & Co., Ltd.
Dusold v. Porta-John Corp. 807 P.2d 526 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Dusold v. Porta-John Corp. 807 P.2d 526 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
See, e.g., Bar- *363 , Lewin v. Miller Wagner & Co., Ltd.
Colberg v. Rellinger 770 P.2d 346 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Cashway Concrete & Materials v. Sanner Contracting Co. 761 P.2d 155 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Cashway Concrete & Materials v. Sanner Contracting Co. 761 P.2d 155 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
See Barmat v. John & Jane Doe Partners, , , Lewin v. Miller-Wagner & Co.
Barmat v. John and Jane Doe Partners AD 747 P.2d 1218 Ariz. 1987
Morris v. Achen Const. Co., Inc. 747 P.2d 1211 Ariz. 1987
Barmat v. John and Jane Doe Partners AD 747 P.2d 1218 Ariz. 1987
(both dealing with the attempt to recover attorney’s fees for breach of bailment contract implied in fact); , (declining to apply contract statute of limitations in malpractice action against accountant); Lewin v. Miller Wagner & Co., , (disallowing attorney’s fees in malpractice action against accountant); Trebilcox v. Brown & Bain, P.A., , (reaching opposite result in breach of fiduciary duty action against attorney).
Morris v. Achen Const. Co., Inc. 747 P.2d 1211 Ariz. 1987
Sparks, supra; Lewin, [v. Miller Wagner & Co., , ], supra.
Haldiman v. Gosnell Development Corp. 748 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Haldiman v. Gosnell Development Corp. 748 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
More recently, in Lewin v. Miller Wagner & Co., , this court held that attorneys’ *591 fees could not be awarded pursuant to A.R.
Western Technologies, Inc. v. Sverdrup & Parcel, Inc. 739 P.2d 1318 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Western Technologies, Inc. v. Sverdrup & Parcel, Inc. 739 P.2d 1318 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Trebilcox v. Brown & Bain, P.A., , and Lewin v. Miller Wagner & Co.
Borja v. Phoenix General Hospital, Inc. 727 P.2d 355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
Borja v. Phoenix General Hospital, Inc. 727 P.2d 355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
See Lewin v. Miller Wagner & Co.