Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Pioneer Roofing Co. v. Mardian Construction Co., 733 P.2d 652.

85 citing documents.

Henry v. Cook 938 P.2d 91 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Co., , (trial court has discretion to determine successful party in multiparty case).
Amerco v. Shoen 907 P.2d 536 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Amerco v. Shoen 907 P.2d 536 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Jordan v. Burgbacher 883 P.2d 458 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Jordan v. Burgbacher 883 P.2d 458 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
We followed a , : The court will not infer a prohibition against the recovery of attorney’s fees to one party under § 12-341.01 simply because a contract contains a unilateral attorney’s fees provision favorable to another party.
City of Cottonwood v. James L. Fann Contracting, Inc. 877 P.2d 284 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
City of Cottonwood v. James L. Fann Contracting, Inc. 877 P.2d 284 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Pioneer Annuity Life Insurance v. Rich 880 P.2d 682 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Pioneer Annuity Life Insurance v. Rich 880 P.2d 682 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Cotterhill v. Bafile 865 P.2d 120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Cotterhill v. Bafile 865 P.2d 120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Hauskins v. McGillicuddy 852 P.2d 1226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Hauskins v. McGillicuddy 852 P.2d 1226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Schweber Electronics v. National Semiconductor Corp. 850 P.2d 119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Distinguished Schweber Electronics v. National Semiconductor Corp. 850 P.2d 119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Czarnecki v. Volkswagen of America 837 P.2d 1143 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Czarnecki v. Volkswagen of America 837 P.2d 1143 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Timmons v. City of Tucson 830 P.2d 871 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Timmons v. City of Tucson 830 P.2d 871 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Walter v. Simmons 818 P.2d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Washington Elementary School District No. 6 v. Baglino Corp. 817 P.2d 3 Ariz. 1991
Walter v. Simmons 818 P.2d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Washington Elementary School District No. 6 v. Baglino Corp. 817 P.2d 3 Ariz. 1991
Co., , Allison Steel, 22 Ariz. App. at 80 , 523 P.2d at 807 .
Adams Insulation Co. v. Los Portales Associates Ltd. Partnership 804 P.2d 841 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Adams Insulation Co. v. Los Portales Associates Ltd. Partnership 804 P.2d 841 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Schwartz v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 800 P.2d 20 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Schwartz v. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona 800 P.2d 20 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Exodyne Properties, Inc. v. City of Phoenix 798 P.2d 1382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Exodyne Properties, Inc. v. City of Phoenix 798 P.2d 1382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
the statute providing for attorney’s fees is permissive, the awarding of attorney’s fees was a matter within the discretion of the trial court.”); -67 , -63 (App.1986) (award of attorney’s fees under A.R.S.
Newell v. Town of Oro Valley 789 P.2d 394 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Newell v. Town of Oro Valley 789 P.2d 394 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Leo Eisenberg & Co., Inc. v. Payson 785 P.2d 49 Ariz. 1989
Leo Eisenberg & Co., Inc. v. Payson 785 P.2d 49 Ariz. 1989
Andrews v. Fry's Food Stores of Arizona 770 P.2d 397 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Andrews v. Fry's Food Stores of Arizona 770 P.2d 397 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989