DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Valladee v. Valladee, 718 P.2d 206.

26 citing documents.

  • Smith v. Harter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
  • Smith v. Harter Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
    ¶26 When property purchased with a spouse’s separate funds is gifted to the community, the gift “encompasses any monies spent in the past by [the spouse] in order to acquire it.”
  • Schoenherr v. Carey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
  • Schoenherr v. Carey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
    ¶16 To overcome a presumption of gift, the contributing spouse must present “clear and convincing evidence to the contrary.”
  • Hernandez v. Hernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Hernandez v. Hernandez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • Williams v. Stapley-Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Williams v. Stapley-Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Egizzii v. Egizzii Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Egizzii v. Egizzii Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    the paying joint tenant is entitled to reimbursement.” (wife was entitled to reimbursement for using her separate funds to pay the spouses’ joint-tenancy obligations, including mortgage payments and taxes); (“Under the general rules of joint tenancy, a tenant has a right to contribution from 2 We cite to the current version of the applicable statute unless revisions material to this decision have occurred since the events in question.
  • Robbins v. Townsend Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Robbins v. Townsend Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • McCreary v. Silver Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • McCreary v. Silver Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    see also Flower, 223 Ariz. at 535 ¶ 15 (“[A] presumption exists that the contributing spouse intended to make a gift to the other spouse of a one-half interest in the property.”).
  • Shurts v. Shurts Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • Shurts v. Shurts Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • In Re Marriage of Flower 225 P.3d 588 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
  • In Re Marriage of Inboden 225 P.3d 599 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
  • In Re Marriage of Flower 225 P.3d 588 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
    4 See, e.g., Toth, 190 Ariz. at 220-21 , 946 P.2d at 902 -03 ( , , , ).
  • In Re Marriage of Inboden 225 P.3d 599 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
  • Toth v. Toth 946 P.2d 900 Ariz. 1997
  • Toth v. Toth 946 P.2d 900 Ariz. 1997
    Becchelli 109 Ariz. at 232-33 , 508 P.2d at 62-63 ; , *221 (App.1986).
  • Hatcher v. Hatcher 933 P.2d 1222 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
  • Hatcher v. Hatcher 933 P.2d 1222 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
  • Whitmore v. Mitchell 733 P.2d 310 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
  • Whitmore v. Mitchell 733 P.2d 310 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
    The parties have not discussed the difference between defining their interests as joint tenancies or as community property estates, , which notes this as a most important distinction.