Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Cluff v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 460 P.2d 666.

70 citing documents.

Maldonado v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. 629 P.2d 1001 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Maldonado v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. 629 P.2d 1001 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Continental Life & Acc.
Deno v. Transamerica Title Insurance 617 P.2d 35 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Deno v. Transamerica Title Insurance 617 P.2d 35 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Cluff v. Farmers Insurance Ex *529 change, , , 39 A.L.R.3d 731 (1969).
Davis v. First Nat. Bank of Arizona 605 P.2d 37 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Davis v. First Nat. Bank of Arizona 605 P.2d 37 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Continental Life & Accident Co. v. Songer 603 P.2d 921 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Continental Life & Accident Co. v. Songer 603 P.2d 921 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
istress, 9 one may recover such damages “only where the defendant’s acts are ‘so outrageous in character and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency, and to be regarded as atrocious, and utterly intolerable in a civilized community.’ ” Patton v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n, , 476, , 155 (1978); , Restatement (Second) of Torts § 46, Comment d (1965).
Country Escrow Service v. Janes 591 P.2d 999 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Country Escrow Service v. Janes 591 P.2d 999 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Rondelli v. County of Pima 586 P.2d 1295 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Rondelli v. County of Pima 586 P.2d 1295 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Restatement of Torts (Second) § 46, Comment h. Appellant complained that he was stereotyped as a “Mafiosi”, detained with his family for an hour without explanation, searched and handcuffed outside his car in full view of motorists on a street frequently used by his neighbors and friends, treate
Patton v. FIRST FED. SAV. & LOAN ASS'N, ETC. 578 P.2d 152 Ariz. 1978
Patton v. FIRST FED. SAV. & LOAN ASS'N, ETC. 578 P.2d 152 Ariz. 1978
Hixon v. State Compensation Fund 565 P.2d 898 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Hixon v. State Compensation Fund 565 P.2d 898 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
Bendalin v. Valley National Bank of Arizona, 24 Ariz.App.
Bendalin v. Valley National Bank of Arizona 540 P.2d 194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Bendalin v. Valley National Bank of Arizona 540 P.2d 194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Linsenmeyer v. Hancock 533 P.2d 1181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Linsenmeyer v. Hancock 533 P.2d 1181 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Exchange, , we feel there was sufficient evidence in this instance for the question to be submitted to the jury at the first trial and for them to be instructed concerning the tort.