Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Taylor v. ARIZ. LAW ENFORCEMENT MERIT SYSTEM, 731 P.2d 95.

21 citing documents.

Pourshirazi v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Council, -08 (App. 1987); Bishop v. Law Enf’t Merit Sys.
Cleckner v. Adhs Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Council, (“The determination of the penalty imposed by an administrative body will not be disturbed unless there has been a clear abuse of discretion.”).
Thomas horne/kathleen Winn v. Sheila Polk 394 P.3d 651 Ariz. 2017
Council, (“A conflict of interest would clearly arise if the same assistant attorney general participated as an advocate before the council and simultaneously served as an advisor to the council in the same matter.”).
Rash v. Town of Mammoth 315 P.3d 1234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Rash v. Town of Mammoth 315 P.3d 1234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Council, (DPS employee); Bishop v. Law Enforcement Merit Sys.
Coplan v. Arizona State Board of Appraisal 218 P.3d 1056 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Coplan v. Arizona State Board of Appraisal 218 P.3d 1056 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Council, , (“The determination of the penalty imposed by an administrative body will not be disturbed unless there has been a clear abuse of discretion.”).
Southwest Airlines Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 4 P.3d 1018 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Southwest Airlines Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 4 P.3d 1018 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Council, , (concluding that reversal disqualifies plaintiff as “prevailing party” under section 12-348(A)(3)).
Culpepper v. State 930 P.2d 508 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Culpepper v. State 930 P.2d 508 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Hamilton v. City of Mesa 916 P.2d 1136 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Lathrop v. Arizona Board of Chiropractic Examiners 894 P.2d 715 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Lathrop v. Arizona Board of Chiropractic Examiners 894 P.2d 715 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Williams v. Pima County 791 P.2d 1053 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Williams v. Pima County 791 P.2d 1053 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Avila v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 772 P.2d 600 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Turf Paradise, Inc. v. Arizona Racing Commission 772 P.2d 595 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Turf Paradise, Inc. v. Arizona Racing Commission 772 P.2d 595 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
a case neither party cited in connection with this issue, Division One of this court observed that “[a] conflict of interest would clearly arise if the same assistant attorney general participated as an advocate before the council and simultaneously served as an advisor to the council in the
Janusz v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 759 P.2d 650 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Janusz v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 759 P.2d 650 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by