Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Amex Distributing Co., Inc. v. Mascari, 724 P.2d 596.

28 citing documents.

Arborcraft v. Arizona Urban Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Arborcraft v. Arizona Urban Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Co., –19 (App. 1986) (noting an agreement prohibiting terminated employee from doing business with former employer’s customers for “some duration” under three years would have been justifiable).
Ahern v. equipmentshare.com Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Ahern v. equipmentshare.com Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
–96 (1970) (customer list was not protected in part because customers were “well-known” to other printing concerns operating in Phoenix).
Electronic Payment v. Kennedy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Electronic Payment v. Kennedy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Diazteca v. Palenque Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Diazteca v. Palenque Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Orca Communications Unlimited, LLC v. Noder 314 P.3d 89 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Orca Communications Unlimited, LLC v. Noder 314 P.3d 89 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Calisi v. Unified Financial Services, LLC 302 P.3d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Calisi v. Unified Financial Services, LLC 302 P.3d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Co., , (under common law, customer list was not trade secret when customers were known and generally accessible to competitors); accord Delta Med.
Taser International, Inc. v. Ward 231 P.3d 921 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Taser International, Inc. v. Ward 231 P.3d 921 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
(“One who has worked in a particular field cannot be compelled to erase from his mind all of the general skills, knowledge and expertise acquired through his experience.”) (quoting ILG Indus., Inc. v. Scott, 49 Ill.2d 88 , 273 N.E.2d 393, 396 (1971)).
Center Bay Gardens, L.L.C. v. City of Tempe City Council 153 P.3d 374 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Center Bay Gardens, L.L.C. v. City of Tempe City Council 153 P.3d 374 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Co., , (“Our society is extremely mobile and our free economy is based upon competition.”).
Bed Mart, Inc. v. Kelley 45 P.3d 1219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Bed Mart, Inc. v. Kelley 45 P.3d 1219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
restraints in the commercial context are reasonable in duration for the time necessary for the employer to put a new employee on the job and for the new employee to have a reasonable opportunity to demonstrate his effectiveness to the customers.
Enterprise Leasing Co. of Phoenix v. Ehmke 3 P.3d 1064 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Enterprise Leasing Co. of Phoenix v. Ehmke 3 P.3d 1064 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Robert P. Merges et al., Intellectual Property in the New technological Age 59 (1997).
Valley Medical Specialists v. Farber 982 P.2d 1277 Ariz. 1999
Valley Medical Specialists v. Farber 982 P.2d 1277 Ariz. 1999
Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Co. of Arizona, Inc. v. McKinney 946 P.2d 464 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Co. of Arizona, Inc. v. McKinney 946 P.2d 464 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Bryceland v. Northey 772 P.2d 36 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Bryceland v. Northey 772 P.2d 36 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Mattison v. Johnston 730 P.2d 286 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Mattison v. Johnston 730 P.2d 286 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Cf. Amex Distributing Co.