Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Cauble v. Osselaer, 722 P.2d 983.

31 citing documents.

Berkman v. Walt Danley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Berkman v. Walt Danley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Toller v. Toller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Toller v. Toller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Instead, we must uphold the trial court’s determination unless we find it is without any evidence to support it or is absolutely contrary to the uncontradicted and unconflicting evidence on which it purports to rest.”
Phillips v. Cabrera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Phillips v. Cabrera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Castro, 222 Ariz. at 52, ¶ 11 ().
Motta v. Flagstar Bank Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Motta v. Flagstar Bank Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
We will uphold the court’s factual finding “unless we find it is without any evidence to support it or is absolutely contrary to the uncontradicted and unconflicting evidence on which it purports to rest.” (citing Ariz. Dep’t of Pub.
Hoffmann v. Hoffmann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Hoffmann v. Hoffmann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
(“Where a factual determination within the trial court’s discretion is challenged on appeal, we cannot reweigh the evidence and substitute our own evaluation of it.”).
McA Financial Group, Ltd. v. Enterprise Bank & Trust 341 P.3d 1161 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
McA Financial Group, Ltd. v. Enterprise Bank & Trust 341 P.3d 1161 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
of Maricopa, (receiver’s authority derived “‘solely from the act of the court’”; receiver is “‘subject of its order only’”), 295 P. at 322, 324 (1931); (fixing of receiver’s fee within court’s discretion).
Rozenman v. Rozenman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Rozenman v. Rozenman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
(“Where a factual determination within the trial court's discretion is challenged on appeal, we cannot reweigh the evidence and substitute our own evaluation of it.”).
Keystone Floor & More, LLC v. Arizona Registrar of Contractors 219 P.3d 237 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Keystone Floor & More, LLC v. Arizona Registrar of Contractors 219 P.3d 237 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
See Lewin v. Miller Wagner & Co., Ltd.
Castro v. Ballesteros-Suarez 213 P.3d 197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Castro v. Ballesteros-Suarez 213 P.3d 197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Cyprus Bagdad Copper Corp. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 992 P.2d 5 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Cyprus Bagdad Copper Corp. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 992 P.2d 5 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Schwab Sales, Inc. v. GN Const. Co., Inc. 992 P.2d 1128 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Schwab Sales, Inc. v. GN Const. Co., Inc. 992 P.2d 1128 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Lew-in v. Miller Wagner & Co., Ltd., , , 722 P,2d 983, 989 (App.1986) (claim arose from “breach of an independent duty inherent in the legal relationship created by the trial court’s order appointing” a receiver).
O'KEEFE v. Grenke 825 P.2d 985 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
O'KEEFE v. Grenke 825 P.2d 985 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Co., Inc., , , Lewin v. Miller Wagner & Co., Ltd., , Sanchez-O’
State Ex Rel. Department of Health Services v. Cochise County 800 P.2d 578 Ariz. 1990
Cashway Concrete & Materials v. Sanner Contracting Co. 761 P.2d 155 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Cashway Concrete & Materials v. Sanner Contracting Co. 761 P.2d 155 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
See Barmat v. John & Jane Doe Partners, , , Lewin v. Miller-Wagner & Co.
Haldiman v. Gosnell Development Corp. 748 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Haldiman v. Gosnell Development Corp. 748 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
See also, , , Western Technologies, Inc. v. Sverdrup & Parcel, Inc., -9 , -26 (App.1986).
Western Technologies, Inc. v. Sverdrup & Parcel, Inc. 739 P.2d 1318 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
Western Technologies, Inc. v. Sverdrup & Parcel, Inc. 739 P.2d 1318 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
-36 , -85 (1986); -62 , -89 (1986).