Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Lange v. Lotzer, 727 P.2d 38.

37 citing documents.

State v. Series Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Series Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Attorneys’ Fees, Expert Witness Fees, and Costs ¶25 The State contends Series cannot recover attorneys’ fees under § 12-348(A)(1), for the proposition that § 12-1103(B) is the exclusive basis for awarding fees in a quiet title action.
McEuen v. Christensen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
McEuen v. Christensen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
§ 12-1103(B); (“The Arizona Legislature has expressly determined that only a prevailing party who follows certain prerequisites may recover attorney’s fees in quiet title actions.”).
Clark v. Clark Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Clark v. Clark Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Roe v. Austin 433 P.3d 569 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
Roe v. Austin 433 P.3d 569 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
Although § 12-1103(B) ordinarily provides the exclusive basis for attorney fees in quiet title actions, see Lewis v. Pleasant Country, Ltd. , , 195, , 1060 (App. 1992) ; Lange v. Lotzer , , 262, , 40 (App. 1986), we conclude Valer may recover under § 12-341.01 in this instance, because her quiet title action was a counterclaim to the Roes' life estate claim.
Cook v. Grebe 429 P.3d 1161 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Cook v. Grebe 429 P.3d 1161 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
(“The Arizona Legislature has expressly determined that only a prevailing party who follows certain prerequisites may recover attorney’s fees in quiet title actions.”).
Biel v. Crg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Biel v. Crg Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Focus point/kantor v. johnson/oak Acres 330 P.3d 360 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Focus point/kantor v. johnson/oak Acres 330 P.3d 360 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
(“The law is well settled that a specific statute governs over a general statute on the same subject and will control.”).
johnson/psychological v. Hon. o'connor/state Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Johnson v. O'Connor 327 P.3d 218 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
johnson/psychological v. Hon. o'connor/state Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Long v. Clark 244 P.3d 99 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Long v. Clark 244 P.3d 99 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
LEVERAGED LAND COMPANY, LLC v. Hodges 232 P.3d 756 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
LEVERAGED LAND COMPANY, LLC v. Hodges 232 P.3d 756 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
(holding payment of five dollars to other party prerequisite for recovering attorney fees pursuant to § 12-1103(B)).
Chaurasia v. General Motors Corp. 126 P.3d 165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Chaurasia v. General Motors Corp. 126 P.3d 165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
¶ 31 Equally unavailing is Chaurasia’s
Lavidas v. Smith 987 P.2d 212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
Lavidas v. Smith 987 P.2d 212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
Assuming arguen-do that § 12-1103(B) permits an attorney’s fee award to the defendant in a quiet title action, the record does not indicate that Smith “followed the statutory prerequisites.”
Berryhill v. Moore 881 P.2d 1182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Berryhill v. Moore 881 P.2d 1182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Arizona Board of Regents v. Main Street Mesa Associates 891 P.2d 889 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Arizona Board of Regents v. Main Street Mesa Associates 891 P.2d 889 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Lewis v. Pleasant Country, Ltd. 840 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Lewis v. Pleasant Country, Ltd. 840 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Scottsdale Memorial Health Systems, Inc. v. Clark 791 P.2d 1094 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Fugate v. Town of Payson 791 P.2d 1092 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Fugate v. Town of Payson 791 P.2d 1092 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Scottsdale Memorial Health Systems, Inc. v. Clark 791 P.2d 1094 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Dickens v. First American Title Insurance 784 P.2d 717 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Dickens v. First American Title Insurance 784 P.2d 717 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Because Dickens did not comply with that statute, First American argues he may not recover attorney’s fees

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by