Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite United Bank of Arizona v. Allyn, 805 P.2d 1012.

165 citing documents.

Blankenbaker v. Jonovich 52 P.3d 795 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Kerr v. Killian 32 P.3d 408 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Kerr v. Killian 32 P.3d 408 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Havasu Springs Resort Co. v. La Paz County 18 P.3d 143 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Havasu Springs Resort Co. v. La Paz County 18 P.3d 143 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
Bernal v. Loeks 997 P.2d 1192 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
State Compensation Fund v. Yellow Cab Co. 3 P.3d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
State Compensation Fund v. Yellow Cab Co. 3 P.3d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Boomer v. Frank 993 P.2d 456 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Boomer v. Frank 993 P.2d 456 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
where the evidence or inferences would permit a jury to resolve a material issue in favor of either party, summary judgment is improper.”
Brown v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 977 P.2d 807 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Brown v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 977 P.2d 807 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Elia v. Pifer 977 P.2d 796 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
Elia v. Pifer 977 P.2d 796 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
De Alfy Properties v. Pima County 985 P.2d 522 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
De Alfy Properties v. Pima County 985 P.2d 522 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1998
Sanchez v. City of Tucson 953 P.2d 168 Ariz. 1998
Sanchez v. City of Tucson 953 P.2d 168 Ariz. 1998
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance v. Mandile 963 P.2d 295 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance v. Mandile 963 P.2d 295 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Co. of Arizona, Inc. v. McKinney 946 P.2d 464 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
(“[Ajppellate courts apply the same standard as that used by the trial court in ruling on the summary judgment in the first instance.”).
Doe v. Miles Inc. 945 P.2d 1304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Doe v. Miles Inc. 945 P.2d 1304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Knauss v. DND Neffson Co. 963 P.2d 271 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Knauss v. DND Neffson Co. 963 P.2d 271 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Dole Food Co. v. North Carolina Foam Industries, Inc. 935 P.2d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Dole Food Co. v. North Carolina Foam Industries, Inc. 935 P.2d 876 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Mohave Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Byers 942 P.2d 451 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Mohave Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Byers 942 P.2d 451 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Dugan v. Fujitsu Business Communications Systems, Inc. 937 P.2d 706 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Dugan v. Fujitsu Business Communications Systems, Inc. 937 P.2d 706 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Doe v. Roe 931 P.2d 1115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Max of Switzerland, Inc. v. Allright Corp. 930 P.2d 1010 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Max of Switzerland, Inc. v. Allright Corp. 930 P.2d 1010 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Arizona Life & Disability Insurance Guaranty Fund v. Honeywell, Inc. 927 P.2d 806 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Arizona Life & Disability Insurance Guaranty Fund v. Honeywell, Inc. 927 P.2d 806 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Logerquist v. Danforth 932 P.2d 281 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Service Merchandise Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 937 P.2d 336 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Service Merchandise Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 937 P.2d 336 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Logerquist v. Danforth 932 P.2d 281 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Valencia Energy Co. v. Arizona Department of Revenue 938 P.2d 474 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
195, , 1016 (App. 1990).
Piccola by and Through Piccola v. Woodall 921 P.2d 710 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Piccola by and Through Piccola v. Woodall 921 P.2d 710 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Hamilton v. State 925 P.2d 731 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Hamilton v. State 925 P.2d 731 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
McDaniel v. Troy Design Services Co. 925 P.2d 693 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
195, , 1016 (App. 1990).
MacCollum v. Perkinson 913 P.2d 1097 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
MacCollum v. Perkinson 913 P.2d 1097 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
A presumption in favor of a community obligation arises “when either spouse incurs a debt during marriage for the benefit of the marital community.”
Prince v. City of Apache Junction 912 P.2d 47 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Adams v. State 916 P.2d 1156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by