Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Barrett v. Samaritan Health Services, Inc., 735 P.2d 460.

32 citing documents.

Schnurr v. Banner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Schnurr v. Banner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Mauney v. Khan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Mauney v. Khan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
§ 12–563; Barrett v. Samaritan Health Servs., Inc., Gregg v. Nat'l Med.
Polyard v. Alattar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Polyard v. Alattar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
§ 12– 563; Barrett v. Samaritan Health Servs., Inc., Gregg v. Nat’l Med.
Fadely v. Encompass Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Fadely v. Encompass Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Inc., (applying “well- entrenched principles of respondeat superior”).
State v. Najera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Najera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Barrett v. Samaritan Health Servs., Inc.
St. George v. Plimpton 384 P.3d 1243 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
St. George v. Plimpton 384 P.3d 1243 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Hon. rogers/hon. ditsworth/morgan 352 P.3d 451 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Hon. rogers/hon. ditsworth/morgan 352 P.3d 451 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
We recognize that jury instructions describing the results of prior judicial proceedings have been upheld when they “merely informed the jury of an uncontroverted fact.” See Barrett v. Samaritan Health Servs., Inc.
Seisinger v. Siebel 195 P.3d 200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Seisinger v. Siebel 195 P.3d 200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
See, e.g., Barrett v. Samaritan Health Seros., Inc.
Henry v. Flagstaff Medical Center, Inc. 132 P.3d 304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Henry v. Flagstaff Medical Center, Inc. 132 P.3d 304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
¶ 14 FMC makes passing references to Barrett v. Samaritan Health Services, Inc., , P.2d 1153 (1972), both of which cases involved similar issues.
In Re Leon G. 59 P.3d 779 Ariz. 2002
In Re Leon G. 59 P.3d 779 Ariz. 2002
427 P.2d, 143, 145 (1967)
State v. Noriega 928 P.2d 706 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Noriega 928 P.2d 706 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
Barrett v. Samaritan Health Services, Inc.
Perguson v. Tamis 937 P.2d 347 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Perguson v. Tamis 937 P.2d 347 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Taylor, 124 Ariz. at 518 , 606 P.2d at 8 ; , Gaston, 121 Ariz. at 53 , 588 P.2d at 346 .
Cotterhill v. Bafile 865 P.2d 120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Cotterhill v. Bafile 865 P.2d 120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Barrett v. Samaritan Health Servs., Inc.
Lay v. City of Mesa 815 P.2d 921 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Lay v. City of Mesa 815 P.2d 921 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
The purpose of jury instructions is to inform the jury of the applicable law in understandable terms, Barrett v. Samaritan Health Services, Inc., , and that the decision must be based upon the law.
Peacock v. Samaritan Health Service 765 P.2d 525 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Peacock v. Samaritan Health Service 765 P.2d 525 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
See also Barrett v. Samaritan Health Serv., Inc., , Gregg v. National Med.
Bell v. Maricopa Medical Center 755 P.2d 1180 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Bell v. Maricopa Medical Center 755 P.2d 1180 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Barrett v. Samaritan Health Services, Inc.