Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Ace Automotive Products, Inc. v. Van Duyne, 750 P.2d 898.

66 citing documents.

State v. Bradley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Bradley Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Smith v. Almida Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Smith v. Almida Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Products, SMITH v. ALMIDA Decision of the Court 898, 901 (App. 1987) (appellate court has no duty to develop a party’s argument).
Cook v. Losnegard 265 P.3d 384 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Cook v. Losnegard 265 P.3d 384 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Products, , (it is not the role of the appellate court to decipher, develop, and address arguments not clearly presented).
Miller v. Arizona Corp. Commission 251 P.3d 400 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Miller v. Arizona Corp. Commission 251 P.3d 400 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Minjares v. State 219 P.3d 264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Minjares v. State 219 P.3d 264 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
¶24 We have held that “[t]he power to correct clerical error does not extend to the changing of a judgment, order, or decree which was entered as the court intended.” Ace Automotive Prods., -43 , -01 (App.1987).
Broemmer v. Otto 821 P.2d 204 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Broemmer v. Otto 821 P.2d 204 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
-22 , Ace Automotive Products
Flynn v. Cornoyer-Hedrick Architects & Planners, Inc. 772 P.2d 10 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Flynn v. Cornoyer-Hedrick Architects & Planners, Inc. 772 P.2d 10 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
*190 , Ace Automotive Products, -144 , -902 (App.1987).
Eloy Industrial Engines v. R.B. Enterprises 764 P.2d 30 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Eloy Industrial Engines v. R.B. Enterprises 764 P.2d 30 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
In this case we are presented with a question which was left unanswered in Ace Automotive Products

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by