Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Harris v. Reserve Life Insurance, 762 P.2d 1334.

36 citing documents.

Andrich v. Allen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Andrich v. Allen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Red Mountain v. Ingle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Red Mountain v. Ingle Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Co., (“Rule 11, of course, deals with some of the same issues as A.R.S.
Kresock v. Depaoli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Kresock v. Depaoli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
In the course of our review, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to sustaining the sanction, -83 (App. 1988) (citing Davis v. Tucson Ariz. Boys Choir Soc’y, ), and will affirm if there is any basis to do so supported by the record, ¶ 33 (App. 2010) ().
Calderon v. Mennenga Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Calderon v. Mennenga Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Newman v. Select Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Newman v. Select Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Kurowski v. Gorman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Kurowski v. Gorman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Clark v. Anjackco Inc. 333 P.3d 779 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Clark v. Anjackco Inc. 333 P.3d 779 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Bennett Blum, M.D., Inc. v. Cowan Law Office of Rand Haddock 330 P.3d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Bennett Blum, M.D., Inc. v. Cowan Law Office of Rand Haddock 330 P.3d 961 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Thompson v. Corry 291 P.3d 358 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Thompson v. Corry 291 P.3d 358 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
Roberts v. City of Phoenix 235 P.3d 265 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Roberts v. City of Phoenix 235 P.3d 265 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Co., , (internal citation omitted).
SOLIMENO v. Yonan 227 P.3d 481 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
SOLIMENO v. Yonan 227 P.3d 481 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Co., , (internal citation omitted).
McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc. 202 P.3d 536 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
McMurray v. Dream Catcher USA, Inc. 202 P.3d 536 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
Co., , in support of its position.
Britt v. Steffen 205 P.3d 357 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Britt v. Steffen 205 P.3d 357 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Co., , (affirming award of costs when complaint was dismissed for failure to prosecute: “The fact that the action is dismissed without prejudice and that plaintiff can refile is not relevant.”).
Fulton Homes Corp. v. BBP CONCRETE 155 P.3d 1090 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Fulton Homes Corp. v. BBP CONCRETE 155 P.3d 1090 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Co., , we noted that the trial court may award costs to the defendant as a “successful party” pursuant to A.R.S.
Fillmore v. MARICOPA WATER PROCESSING 120 P.3d 697 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Fillmore v. MARICOPA WATER PROCESSING 120 P.3d 697 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
ABC Supply, Inc. v. Edwards 952 P.2d 286 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
ABC Supply, Inc. v. Edwards 952 P.2d 286 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Co., , (emphasis added).
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Tocco 845 P.2d 513 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State Ex Rel. Corbin v. Tocco 845 P.2d 513 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Heuisler v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 812 P.2d 1096 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Heuisler v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. 812 P.2d 1096 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Co., , or whether a sanction imposed under Rule 11 was appropriate

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by