Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Boyce v. City of Scottsdale, 756 P.2d 934.
- Joshua Tree v. State Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
-
Joshua Tree v. State
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
of Educ., 192 Ariz. 4 JOSHUA TREE, et al. v. STATE, et al. Opinion of the Court 156, 165 ¶ 35 (App. 1998) ().
- Houser v. Phoenix Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
-
Houser v. Phoenix
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
even when agency rules are silent on the question.” Federal Court of Appeals Manual § 17:10 (6th ed. 2019) (recognizing federal-court trend); (stating that “[m]any state courts” use the same rule).
- Cleckner v. Adhs 433 P.3d 1200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Cleckner v. Adhs 433 P.3d 1200 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
- Grosvenor Holdings v. Pinal County Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
-
Grosvenor Holdings v. Pinal County
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
aken, but if an appeal is taken, it will be, pursuant to ARS § 12-901, processed under the [ARA] in the Superior Court.” And, agreeing with the County, the respondent concluded “the County may voluntarily submit to Administrative Review of its decisions, as authorized by ARS § 11-251(21) and ARS § 11-1101(1); see 6 P.2d 934 (App. 1988).” The respondent found the parties had agreed any appeal would be pursuant to the ARA but found, too, that there was no final administrative order to review pursu
- Austin Shea (Arizona) 7th Street & Van Buren, L.L.C. v. City of Phoenix 142 P.3d 693 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
-
Austin Shea (Arizona) 7th Street & Van Buren, L.L.C. v. City of Phoenix
142 P.3d 693
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Accordingly, we have held that a board of adjustment may rehear a matter if authorized to do so by a rule falling “within the standards set forth in the legislative act.” , see also A.R.S.
- Robert J. v. Department of Revenue 995 P.2d 691 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
- Robert J. v. Department of Revenue 995 P.2d 691 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
- Shelby School v. Arizona State Board of Education 962 P.2d 230 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
-
Shelby School v. Arizona State Board of Education
962 P.2d 230
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
These rules are within the standards set forth in the legislative act.”
- Schwartz v. SUPERIOR CT. IN MARICOPA CTY. 925 P.2d 1068 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
- Schwartz v. SUPERIOR CT. IN MARICOPA CTY. 925 P.2d 1068 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
- Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Administration v. Carondelet Health System 935 P.2d 844 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
- Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Administration v. Carondelet Health System 935 P.2d 844 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
- Dioguardi v. Superior Court 909 P.2d 481 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
-
Dioguardi v. Superior Court
909 P.2d 481
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
are strictly limited by the statute creating them.”
- RL Augustine Const. v. PEORIA SCHOOL DIST. 904 P.2d 462 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
-
RL Augustine Const. v. PEORIA SCHOOL DIST.
904 P.2d 462
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
§ 12-901(1); , McClanahan, 25 Ariz. App. at 15 , 540 P.2d at 746 .
- R.L. Augustine Construction Co. v. Peoria Unified School District No. 11 904 P.2d 462 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
-
R.L. Augustine Construction Co. v. Peoria Unified School District No. 11
904 P.2d 462
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
§ 12-901(1); , McClanahan, 25 Ariz.App.
- City of Phoenix v. Phoenix Civil Service Board 818 P.2d 241 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
- City of Phoenix v. Phoenix Civil Service Board 818 P.2d 241 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
- Siegel v. Arizona State Liquor Board 807 P.2d 1136 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
-
Siegel v. Arizona State Liquor Board
807 P.2d 1136
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
“The rule that the powers and duties of administrative agencies and other inferior tribunals are strictly limited by the statute creating them continues to the present time as the rule of law in Arizona.”
- Murphy v. Town of Chino Valley 789 P.2d 1072 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
-
Murphy v. Town of Chino Valley
789 P.2d 1072
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
See, , , (“The Board of Adjustment, though structured much like an administrative agency, acts in a quasi-judicial capacity”).