Cited by

See Vinson v. Marton & Assocs., (“A decision becomes moot for purposes of appeal whe[n] .

Further, “specific performance cannot be granted where it is dependent upon the acts of a third person not a party to the litigation.” Vinson v. Marton & Associates

Vinson v. Marton & Assocs., (noting that a court’s decision is moot for appellate purposes when appellate action would have no effect on the parties due to a change in circumstances before the appellate decision).

See Vinson v. Marton & Assocs., (explaining that an issue is moot on appeal if “action by the reviewing court would have no effect on the parties”).

An appeal is moot when, “as a result of a change of circumstances before the appellate decision, action by the reviewing court would have no effect on the parties.” Vinson v. Marton & Assocs.

Generally, an appeal becomes moot when, “as a result of a change of circumstances before the appellate decision, action by the reviewing court would have no effect on the parties.” Vinson v. Marton & Assocs.

DISCUSSION ¶7 An appeal is considered moot when “as a result of a change of circumstances before the appellate decision, action by the reviewing court would have no effect on the parties.” Vinson v. Marton & Assoc.

–94, ¶ 8 (App. 2011) (quoting Vinson v. Marton & Assocs., ).

See Vinson v. Marton & Assocs., (“A decision becomes moot for purposes of appeal where[,] as a result of a change of circumstances before the appellate decision, action by the reviewing court would have no effect on the parties.”).

See Vinson v. Marton & Assocs., (“A decision becomes moot for purposes of appeal where as a result of a change of circumstances before the appellate decision, action by the reviewing court would have no effect on the parties.”).

¶7 “A decision becomes moot for purposes of appeal where[,] as a result of a change of circumstances before the appellate decision, action by the reviewing court would have no effect on the parties.” Vinson v. Marton & Assoc.

Vinson v. Marton & Assocs., (“A decision becomes moot for purposes of appeal where as a result of a change of circumstances before the appellate decision, action by the reviewing court would have no effect on the parties.”).

“A decision becomes moot for purposes of appeal where, as a result of a change of circumstances before the appellate decision, action by the reviewing court would have no effect on the parties.” Vinson v. Marton & Assoc.

Sec., ¶ 10, (otherwise appealable order from permanency hearing essentially moot due to later order terminating parental rights); Vinson v. Marton & Assocs., (when circumstances in a case change to the extent that a reviewing court’s action would have no effect on the parties, then the issue becomes moot for purposes of appeal).

See Vinson v. Marton & Assocs., , (if reviewing court's action would have no effect on parties, an issue is moot for purposes of appeal).

§ 33-420(A), and a cause of action to quiet title, which seeks a judicial determination of title, rather than damages____”); see also BT Capital, 229 Ariz. at 301-02, ¶¶ 15-16 , 275 P.3d at 600-01 (distinguishing Vinson v. Marion & Assocs., , which recognized damages claim when property was sold to third party in land sale contract dispute).

¶15 BT also argues that the court of appeals correctly relied on Vinson v. Marton & Assocs., P.2d 736 (App. 1988), to conclude that BT’s claims for money damages survived the sale of the property.

29 See Vinson v. Marton & Assocs., , (stating that a plaintiff cannot be compelled to elect its remedies before the conclusion of a trial and may move to amend its complaint to conform to evidence adduced at trial).

Mootness ¶ 8 “A decision becomes moot for purposes of appeal where as a result of a change of circumstances before the appellate *194 decision, action by the reviewing court would have no effect on the parties.” Vinson v. Marton & Assocs., , (citing Ariz. State Bd.

¶25 “A decision becomes moot for purposes of appeal where as a result of a change of circumstances before the appellate decision, action by the reviewing court would have no effect on the parties.” Vinson v. Marion & Assocs., , (citing Ariz. State Bd.

As this court held in Vinson v. Morton & Associates, , a case is moot “where as a result of a change of circumstances before the appellate decision, action by the reviewing court would have no effect on the parties.” But “[w]here an appealable issue remains, failure to post a supersedeas bond will not moot an appeal.” Id.

See Vinson v. Marton & Assoc.

See *506 Vinson v. Marion & Assoc., , (“A person cannot be forced to elect before the conclusion of trial the theory he will advance or the remedy he will seek.”).