Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Visco v. Universal Refuse Removal Company, 462 P.2d 90.

78 citing documents.

Knight v. Elias Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Knight v. Elias Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
201(c)(1), (d); ¶ 2 n.2 (App. 2017)
Potter v. Hon cohen/doctor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
Potter v. Hon cohen/doctor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
(“[I]t is proper for a court to take judicial notice of the record in another action tried in that same court.”).
commonwealth/fidelity v. Centerpoint Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
commonwealth/fidelity v. Centerpoint Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“It is the general rule that the exercise of a court’s discretion will not be disturbed unless it is plainly wrong.”
Alcott v. Killebrew Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Alcott v. Killebrew Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
(“It is the general rule that the exercise of a court’s discretion will not be disturbed unless it is plainly wrong.”) ().
Blaser v. Kaiser Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Blaser v. Kaiser Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Accordingly, we must presume the transcript would support the court’s exercise of discretion, n.1 (1986) ( -43 (1982)), and find no error.
Phillips v. Cabrera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Phillips v. Cabrera Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
n.1 (1986) (-43 (1982), ).
Eden v. Deublein Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Eden v. Deublein Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Grady's v. Alliance Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Grady's v. Alliance Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Knight v. Knight Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Knight v. Knight Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
n.1 (1986) (-43 (1982), ).
Jones v. Bell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Jones v. Bell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
3 JONES v. BELL Decision of the Court (1986) (-43 (1982), ).
Yamamoto v. Kercsmar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Yamamoto v. Kercsmar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Lund v. Lund Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Lund v. Lund Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Conversely, “[a] finding of fact cannot be ‘clearly erroneous’ if there is substantial evidence to support it.” ( and Reliable Elec.
Great Western Bank v. LJC Development, LLC 362 P.3d 1037 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Great Western Bank v. LJC Development, LLC 362 P.3d 1037 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Bank of America v. Allen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Bank of America v. Allen Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
And because Allen did not challenge the dismissal of his quiet title action, the court was free to take judicial notice of that action, (noting “it is proper for a court to take judicial notice of the record in another action tried in that same court”) (citations omitted), and he cannot now litigate any issue he could have raised in that lawsuit, see Gatecliff v. Great Republic Life Ins.
Phoenix v. Cortes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Phoenix v. Cortes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
4 PHOENIX v. CORTES Decision of the Court 690-91 (1982), ).
Atkinson v. McIndoo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Atkinson v. McIndoo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
262, 265 n.1 (1986) (“Without a record we must presume that the trial court properly exercised its discretion and that there was substantial evidence in the complete record to support the findings of the trial court.”) (-43, -91 (1982), -76, -93 (1969)).
Midfirst v. Barness Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Midfirst v. Barness Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Montoya Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Montoya Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
We may take judicial notice “of any matter of which the trial court may take judicial notice, even if the trial court was never asked to do so.” (“[I]t is proper for a court to take judicial notice of the record in another action tried in that same court.”).
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. 181 P.3d 219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. 181 P.3d 219 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
Felder v. Physiotherapy Associates 158 P.3d 877 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Felder v. Physiotherapy Associates 158 P.3d 877 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
¶ 6 , , (defining clearly erroneous standard).
Winters v. Arizona Board of Education 83 P.3d 1114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Winters v. Arizona Board of Education 83 P.3d 1114 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Prudential v. Estate of Rojo-Pacheco 962 P.2d 213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Prudential v. Estate of Rojo-Pacheco 962 P.2d 213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
STATE DES v. Valentine 945 P.2d 828 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
STATE DES v. Valentine 945 P.2d 828 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Scottsdale Princess Partnership v. Maricopa County 916 P.2d 1084 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Scottsdale Princess Partnership v. Maricopa County 916 P.2d 1084 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Rule 52(a), Ariz.R.Civ.P.; Federoff v. Pioneer Title & Trust Co. of Arizona
Flagel v. Southwest Clinical Physiatrists, P.C. 755 P.2d 1184 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
Flagel v. Southwest Clinical Physiatrists, P.C. 755 P.2d 1184 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988