Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Havasu Heights Ranch & Development Corp. v. State Land Department, 764 P.2d 37.

44 citing documents.

Challenge v. Wholesale Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Wallace v. Irving Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Singh v. Malhotra Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Vazirani v. Annexus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Rezaik v. Farmers Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Pi'ikea, LLC v. Williamson 321 P.3d 449 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
Clusiau v. Clusiau Enterprises, Inc. 236 P.3d 1194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Young v. Beck 231 P.3d 940 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Koepnick v. Arizona State Land Department 212 P.3d 62 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Koepnick v. Arizona State Land Department 212 P.3d 62 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
¶ 15 Finally, the Department’s , (“Havasu Heights I”).
La Canada Hills Limited Partnership v. Florence Kite Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Corp., (generally, statute of limitations for breach of contract claim runs from time of breach).
Ruesga v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
FL Receivables Trust 2002-A v. Arizona Mills, L.L.C. 111 P.3d 430 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Corp., , (quoting 3A Arthur L. Corbin, Corbin on Contracts § 752 (1960)).
Kuehn v. Stanley, Charter Funding, First Magnus Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Weatherford v. State 54 P.3d 342 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Forest Guardians v. Wells 4 P.3d 1054 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Forest Guardians v. Wells 4 P.3d 1054 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Corp. v. State Land Dep’t
Demasse v. ITT Corp. 984 P.2d 1138 Ariz. 1999
Corp., *510 , , Coronado Co. v. Jacome’s Dep’t Store, Inc., , Yeazell, 98 Ariz. at 115-16 , 402 P.2d at 545-46 .
Demasse v. ITT Corp. 984 P.2d 1138 Ariz. 1999
Corp., *1148 , 164, , 1029 (App. 1992); , Coronado Co. v. Jacome's Dep't Store, Inc., , Yeazell, 98 Ariz. at 115-16 , 402 P.2d at 545-46 .
Tobel v. Travelers Insurance 988 P.2d 148 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
L. Harvey Concrete, Inc. v. Agro Construction & Supply Co. 939 P.2d 811 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Corp., , 162, , 1027 (App. 1992).
Babe Investment v. Arizona Corp. Commission 939 P.2d 425 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Babe Investment v. Arizona Corp. Commission 939 P.2d 425 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Havasu Heights Ranch v. State Land Dep’t
Souza v. Fred Carries Contracts, Inc. 955 P.2d 3 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
Roscoe-Gill v. Newman 937 P.2d 673 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Randall v. Alvarado-Wells 928 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Viewing the evidence and all reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, , the facts are as follows.
Prince v. City of Apache Junction 912 P.2d 47 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1996
Adams v. State 916 P.2d 1156 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Maxwell v. Fidelity Financial Services, Inc. 907 P.2d 51 Ariz. 1995
Corp., , (“Incidental findings of fact are made by the court rather than by a jury, but are accorded the usual weight given to such findings of fact in appellate review.”) (citing Restatement § 208 cmt.
Vega v. Morris 905 P.2d 535 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Hafner v. Beck 916 P.2d 1105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Wallace v. CASA GRANDE SC. BD. OF GOV. 909 P.2d 486 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Williams-Carter v. Maricopa County 903 P.2d 646 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Hawkins v. State, Dept. of Economic SEC. 900 P.2d 1236 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1995
Corp., , Ancell v. Union Station Associates, Inc.
Carondelet Health Services, Inc. v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Administration 895 P.2d 133 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Carondelet Health Services, Inc. v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System Administration 895 P.2d 133 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Corp. v. State Land Dep’t.
Gonzalez v. Satrustegui 870 P.2d 1188 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Maxwell v. Fidelity Financial Services, Inc. 880 P.2d 1090 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Corp., , 167 n. 3, , 1032 n. 3 (Ct.App.1992) (adopting Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 208, cmt.
Waddell v. Arizona State Land Department 873 P.2d 646 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Waddell v. Arizona State Land Department 873 P.2d 646 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Corp. v. State Land Dep’t, , , amended on reconsideration
Havasu Heights Ranch & Development Corp. v. Desert Valley Wood Products, Inc. 807 P.2d 1119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Havasu Heights Ranch & Development Corp. v. Desert Valley Wood Products, Inc. 807 P.2d 1119 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Havasu Heights also relies on Havasu Heights Ranch and Development Corp. v. State Land Dep’t, , to support its claim that the commissioner abused her discretion.
Sunpower v. Arizona State Registrar of Contractors 803 P.2d 430 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Sunpower v. Arizona State Registrar of Contractors 803 P.2d 430 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Corp. v. State *440 Land Dep’t of State of Arizona