Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Asphalt Engineers, Inc. v. Galusha, 770 P.2d 1180.

26 citing documents.

Fong v. City of Phoenix 551 P.3d 1187 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Fong v. City of Phoenix 551 P.3d 1187 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
In such cases, expert testimony is required to establish the standard of care unless “the negligence is so grossly apparent that a lay person would have no difficulty recognizing it,” Asphalt Eng’rs, -36 (App. 1989), or the allegedly negligent 8 FONG v. CITY OF PHOENIX, et al. Opinion of the Court “act or omission comes within the realm of common knowledge,” (App.
Bellemare v. Lemon Law Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Bellemare v. Lemon Law Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Cf. Asphalt Eng’rs, (holding that the jury could find breach of contract when attorney failed to fulfill promise to file liens and institute foreclosure lawsuits if necessary); –01 (App. 1986) (holding that legal malpractice claim sounded in contract when attorney agreed to file lawsuit a
Brody v. Polsinelli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Brody v. Polsinelli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Asphalt Eng’rs, -36 (App. 1989).
Gillespie v. Wallace Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Gillespie v. Wallace Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Klee v. Lunn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Klee v. Lunn Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Dooley Corvallas Development Corp. v. O'Brien 244 P.3d 586 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Dooley Corvallas Development Corp. v. O'Brien 244 P.3d 586 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2010
Compare Asphalt Eng’rs, , (holding that a breach of duties that a fiduciary contractually assumes beyond those duties imposed by law is considered to arise out of contract).
DeSilva v. Baker 96 P.3d 1084 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
DeSilva v. Baker 96 P.3d 1084 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
of the original action would have been successful.” Hyatt Regency Phoenix Hotel Co., v. Winston & Strawn, , (citing Asphalt Eng’r, Inc., v. Galusha, -37 , -83 (App.1989)).
Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc. 6 P.3d 315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Ramsey Air Meds, L.L.C. v. Cutter Aviation, Inc. 6 P.3d 315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
For example, in As phalt Engineers, , an attorney orally contracted with his client to file liens on two construction projects.
Hyatt Regency Phoenix Hotel Co. v. Winston & Strawn 907 P.2d 506 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Hyatt Regency Phoenix Hotel Co. v. Winston & Strawn 907 P.2d 506 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Asphalt Engineers, -37 , -83 (App.1989).
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Western Technologies, Inc. 877 P.2d 294 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Western Technologies, Inc. 877 P.2d 294 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
DeJonghe v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc. 830 P.2d 862 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
DeJonghe v. EF Hutton & Co., Inc. 830 P.2d 862 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
Expert testimony is not necessary when the “negligence is so grossly apparent that a lay person would have no difficulty recognizing it.” Asphalt Engineers, -36 , -82 (App.1989).
Potter v. H. Kern Wisner, M.D., P.C. 823 P.2d 1339 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Potter v. H. Kern Wisner, M.D., P.C. 823 P.2d 1339 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Cf. Asphalt Engineers, , (an attorney malpractice case where the court stated: “Expert testimony was unnecessary in light of Galusha’s own acknowledgement that the alleged conduct fell below the standard of care.”) Wisner did not make a similar admission in this case and therefore, the presumption discussion in Stal
Elliott v. Videan 791 P.2d 639 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
Elliott v. Videan 791 P.2d 639 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990