DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Sorkhabi, 46 P.3d 1071.

32 citing documents.

  • State v. Buzan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • State v. Buzan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    – 52, ¶¶ 2–3 (App. 2002) (defendant threatened use of force to resist an arrest when he physically “struggled” with an officer while the officer was arresting him).
  • State v. Anderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • State v. Anderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    § 13-2508(A)(1)); -52, ¶¶ 2, 10 (App. 2002) (finding defendant’s conduct in “struggl[ing] with” officers was “squarely under” § 13-2508(A)(1)).
  • State v. Matthews 428 P.3d 198 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • State v. Matthews 428 P.3d 198 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    In State v. Sorkhabi , , 452-53, ¶¶ 9, 11, , 1073-74 (App. 2002), this court noted that because "[a]nother person must *201 be involved before a defendant can commit the crime of resisting arrest," the crime is necessarily directed against another person.
  • Phx. City Prosecutor v. Lowery 418 P.3d 1081 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • Phx. City Prosecutor v. Lowery 418 P.3d 1081 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    See State v. Olquin , , 254, ¶ 22, , 232 (App. 2007) (observing that a DUI is considered a victimless crime because it can be committed absent involvement of any other person); State v. Sorkhabi , , 453, ¶ 11, , 1074 (App. 2002) (a "victimless crime" is "a crime which generally involves only the criminal, and which has no direct victim"); Weston v. State , , 186, (noting DUI legislation enacted because "driving an automobile under these circumstances is such a menace
  • State v. Boozer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Boozer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    The court noted Jurden did not exclude officers as victims under the Victims’ Bill of Rights, and that “nowhere in the case did they specifically overrule that prior finding of the Court of Appeals, [in State v. Sorkhabi] which basically held that victim status [was] appropriate.” Jurden, Sorkhabi
  • State v. Payan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Payan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    we squarely addressed the question before us, namely, whether resisting arrest is a victimless crime.
  • State of Arizona v. Samkeita Jahveh Jurden 373 P.3d 543 Ariz. 2016
  • State of Arizona v. Samkeita Jahveh Jurden 373 P.3d 543 Ariz. 2016
    P.3d 616 (App. 2003) (determining the meaning of “effecting an arrest”); ¶ 9, (finding that resisting arrest is not a victimless crime, but rather a crime against a person where a “[d]efendant must use or threaten to use physical force or any other means that creates a substantial risk of causing physical injury to the peace officer”); State v. Womack, 1
  • State v. Jurden 352 P.3d 455 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Jurden 352 P.3d 455 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Yegan 221 P.3d 1027 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
  • State v. Yegan 221 P.3d 1027 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
  • State v. Maldonado 219 P.3d 1050 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
  • State v. Maldonado 219 P.3d 1050 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
  • State v. Flores 188 P.3d 706 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
  • State v. Flores 188 P.3d 706 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
    ¶ 5 , , (subject matter jurisdiction is a question of law and review is de novo).
  • State v. Guadagni 178 P.3d 473 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
  • State v. Guadagni 178 P.3d 473 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
    See, e.g., Wilkinson, , 39 P.3d at 1132 (contracting without license; eontractee victim); ¶¶ 2-3 , (unlawful use of means of transportation; car owner victim); ¶¶ 3, 15 , 789-90 (App. 2004) (attempted escape; state prison victim); ¶¶ 11-13 , (resisting arrest; arresting officer victim).
  • State v. Lee 176 P.3d 712 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
  • State v. Lee 176 P.3d 712 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
    -81, ¶¶ 15-17 , -95 (App.2004) (In attempting to flee from an arrest, the defendant was “kicking his feet” and “pushing on [the officer’s] arm.”), rev’d on other grounds, , -52, ¶¶ 2, 9-10 , -73 (App.2002) (conviction for resisting arrest appropriate when “defendant struggled with” the arresting officers).
  • State v. Olquin 165 P.3d 228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
  • State v. Olquin 165 P.3d 228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
    ¶ 11 , (observing that a “victimless crime” is “a crime which generally involves only the criminal, and which has no direct victim”) (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 1567-68 (6th ed.1990)).
  • State of Arizona v. Matthew Erich Manzanedo 110 P.3d 1026 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
  • State of Arizona v. Matthew Erich Manzanedo 110 P.3d 1026 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
    ¶ 13 , Division One of this court held that resisting arrest is not a victimless crime based on aspects of the applicable statute that also exist in our riot statutes.
  • State of Arizona v. Clayton M. Guilliams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
  • State of Arizona v. Clayton M. Guilliams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
    P.3d 1071 (App. 2002) (crime of resisting arrest, A.R.S.