Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Sullivan, 69 P.3d 1006.

61 citing documents.

Criticized State of Arizona v. Billie Marie Fornof Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
(court of appeals may not disregard decisions of supreme court); see also U.S. Const. art. VI, cl.
State v. Cheramie 171 P.3d 1253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
State v. Cheramie 171 P.3d 1253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
(court of appeals constrained by decisions of supreme court and not permitted to disregard them).
Christy C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 153 P.3d 1074 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Christy C. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 153 P.3d 1074 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
¶¶ 23-24 , (stating that the appropriate way to correct a judge’s harmless error regarding jury instructions would be to "take appropriate supervisory action” with regard to the judge, and not ”penalize[e] victims [or parties] by requiring a new trial”).
Lohmeier v. Hammer 148 P.3d 101 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Lohmeier v. Hammer 148 P.3d 101 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
¶ 49 While Logerquist requires that we affirm the trial court’s ruling, ¶ 15 , (court of appeals bound by decisions of supreme court), we note that the facts of this case call into question many of Logerquist’s widely asserted flaws.
State of Arizona v. Juan Manuel Molina Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State of Arizona v. Juan Manuel Molina Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State of Arizona v. Charles Scott Newnom Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
State of Arizona v. Charles Scott Newnom Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004