Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Maldonado, 78 P.3d 1060.
- State v. Brown 159 P.3d 553 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
-
State v. Brown
159 P.3d 553
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
-34, ¶¶ 11-12 , -56 (App.2006) (holding crucial time for assessing potential sentence for purposes of determining jury number is start of jury deliberations); 3 ¶ 10 , (“[T]he improper denial of a *245 twelve-person jury ...
- State v. Kuck 129 P.3d 954 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
-
State v. Kuck
129 P.3d 954
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2006
Instead, , to support his argument that the maximum potential sentence must be determined at the “outset” of the trial rather than at the start of jury deliberations.
- State v. Kuck 110 P.3d 1022 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
-
State v. Kuck
110 P.3d 1022
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2005
Instead, , to support his argument *291 that the maximum potential sentence must be determined at the “outset” of the trial rather than at the start of jury deliberations.
- State v. Hung Manh Nguyen 93 P.3d 516 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
- State v. Hung Manh Nguyen 93 P.3d 516 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004