Cited by

However, “we may nonetheless reverse for fundamental error not presented by way of appeal that is ‘clearly apparent’ from our review of the record.” ().

¶ 21 (App. 2005); ¶ 12 (App. 2011).

¶ 21 (App. 2005); ¶ 12 (App. 2011).

from committing manslaughter, murder, or aggravated assault thereby warranting a crime- prevention justification instruction.4 the trial court denied the request.

with citations of legal authorities and appropriate references to the portions of the record”); ¶ 20 (App. 2005) (disapproving the practice of incorporation of arguments by reference on appeal).

¶22 While consideration of the history and purpose of the AMMA is not necessary to apply its plain language, ¶ 9 (2008) (), an construed together as though they constitute one law.”) ( ¶ 10 (App. 2005)); see also A.R.S.

Korzep I, 165 Ariz. at 492, 799 P.2d at 833; n.3, n.3 (App. 2005); Hussain, 189 Ariz. at 339, 942 P.2d at 1171.

¶ 17 “Our primary goal in construing a statute is to determine and give effect to the intent of the legislature.” ¶ 10

b. Statutory Construction Principles ¶ 12 “Our primary goal in construing a statute is to determine and give effect to the intent of the legislature.” ¶ 10

¶ 59 This Court was previously faced with the issue of whether a superior court was required to expand the term “unlawful physical force” -47, ¶¶ 18-21 , -79 (App. 2005).