Cited by

(“Although the record contains some conflicting evidence, it 3 STATE v. HICKEY Decision of the Court was for the jury to weigh the evidence and determine the credibility of the witnesses.”).

We do not weigh the evidence, or assess witnesses’ credibility, ¶ 6 (App. 2004), because those are jury functions.

ermine whether a mistrial is warranted because it “is aware of the 7 STATE v. ALLEE Decision of the Court atmosphere of the trial, the circumstances surrounding the incident, the manner in which any objectionable statement was made, and the possible effect on the jury and the trial.” ¶ 47 (App. 2004).

¶ 6 (App. 2004) (discussing that the function of the jury is to weigh evidence and determine credibility).

In evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence, “we do not weigh the evidence; that is the function of the jury.” ¶ 6 (App. 2004).

¶20 When the evidence supporting a verdict is challenged on appeal, we do not reweigh the evidence, ¶ 9 (App. 2013); ¶ 6 (App. 2004), or determine the credibility of witnesses, Williams, 209 Ariz. at 231, ¶ 6; (“This court is not empowered to impose its own determination as to the credibility of [witnesses] in deciding a Rule 20 motion.”).

As the trial court recognized, it was for the jury to weigh the evidence, determine witnesses’ credibility, and ascertain Heitzmann’s intent, see id.; ¶ 6 (App. 2004), and there was substantial evidence from which the jury could conclude Heitzmann intentionally or knowingly directed threats to J.G.

We do not reweigh the evidence or determine the credibility of witnesses, ¶ 6 (App. 2004), or distinguish between direct and circumstantial evidence

The superior court is in the best position to determine whether a mistrial is appropriate because the judge “is aware of the atmosphere of the trial, the circumstances surrounding the incident, the manner in which any objectionable statement was made, and the possible effect on the jury and the trial.” ¶ 47 (App. 2004) (citation omitted).

“Reversible error based on insufficiency of the evidence occurs only where there is a complete absence of probative facts to support the conviction.” ¶ 6 (App. 2004).

¶ 6 (App. 2004) (“[I]t was for the jury to weigh the evidence and determine the credibility of the witnesses.”).

It is the province of the jury, however, and not this court, “to weigh the evidence and determine the credibility of the witnesses.” ¶ 6 (App. 2004).

See, ¶ 6 (App. 2004) (stating “we do not weigh the evidence”); - 83 (1986) (credibility determinations are the jury’s prerogative); (“The weight of all testimony was for the jury.”).