Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Vandever, 119 P.3d 473.

56 citing documents.

  • State v. Schmitz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
  • State v. Schmitz Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
    ¶ 16 (App. 2005), disapproved on other grounds by State v. Aragon ex rel.
  • State of Arizona v. Hon. aragon/max Fontes Ariz. 2022
  • State of Arizona v. Hon. aragon/max Fontes Ariz. 2022
    Similarly, –08 ¶¶ 5–8 (App. 2005), the court of appeals discussed the foreseeability of the victim’s speeding without determining whether the speeding was an intervening event in the first place.
  • State v. Blomdahl Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • State v. Blomdahl Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    ¶ 16 (App. 2005) (amending minute entry to show conviction was for a class 6, not class 3, felony).
  • State v. Cepeda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • State v. Cepeda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    See, e.g., Freeland, 176 Ariz. at 548 (addressing victim’s failure to wear a seatbelt); ¶ 14 (App. 2009) (victim becoming unconscious and drowning after accident was not a superseding cause); ¶ 8 (App. 4 STATE v. CEPEDA Decision of the Court ¶10 Cepeda cites to civil cases -- and Dupray v. JAI Dining Services (Phoenix), Inc., (App
  • State v. Puente Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • State v. Puente Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    (modifying sentence when the superior court’s “intent [was] clear”); ¶ 16 (App. 2005) (recognizing this Court must correct an inadvertent error found in a sentencing minute entry).
  • State v. Jacobson 418 P.3d 960 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Jacobson 418 P.3d 960 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    State v. Randles , , 548 n.1, ¶ 1, , 731 (App. 2014) (citing State v. Vandever , , 207 n.2, ¶ 1, , 474 (App. 2005) ).
  • State v. Dodd 418 P.3d 955 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Dodd 418 P.3d 955 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    *959 State v. Bass , , 575-76 ¶¶ 11-13, ; see also State v. Vandever , , 208 ¶ 8, , 475 (App. 2005) (explaining that a third-party driver's conduct was not an intervening event when the collision "was clearly a foreseeable event within the scope of the risk" created by the defendant's illegal conduct).
  • State v. Daniels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Daniels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    ¶ 16, 4 STATE v. DANIELS Decision of the Court (recognizing this Court must correct an inadvertent error found in the sentencing minute entry).
  • State v. Sommerfield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Sommerfield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    ¶ 8 (App. 2005) (Speeding was not an intervening event because a collision was “clearly a foreseeable event within the scope of the risk created by [the defendant’s] illegal left turn.”).
  • State v. Chevalier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Chevalier Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Dillon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Dillon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    ¶ 16, (recognizing this court must correct an inadvertent error found in the sentencing minute entry).
  • State v. Martinez-Romero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Martinez-Romero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    ¶ 16, (recognizing that this court must correct an inadvertent error found in the sentencing minute entry).
  • State v. McClain Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. McClain Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    ¶ 16, 2 STATE v. MCCLAIN Decision of the Court aggravated DUI, including three counts involving aggravated driving with drugs or their metabolites in his body; and one count of criminal damage of $2,000 or more bu
  • State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Cardwell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Cardwell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    ¶ 7, (citations omitted); ¶ 10, (recognizing that a conviction may be reversed if jury instructions may have misled the jury or are otherwise deficient (citations omitted)).
  • State v. Hollingsworth Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Hollingsworth Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Patron Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Patron Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Felix 349 P.3d 1117 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Felix 349 P.3d 1117 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    207 n. 2, , 474 n. 2 (App.2005).
  • State v. Posey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Posey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Veseli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Veseli Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Osborne Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Osborne Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Randles 334 P.3d 730 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Randles 334 P.3d 730 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Mucciarone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Mucciarone Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Oman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Oman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Shields Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Shields Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014