Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. James, 297 P.3d 182.

122 citing documents.

State v. Tull Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Tull Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
10 STATE v. TULL Decision of the Court error is fundamental, and (3) the error caused him prejudice.” ¶ 11 (App. 2013) (internal quotation omitted).
State v. Escalante 396 P.3d 611 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Escalante 396 P.3d 611 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
On fundamental error review, Esca-lante “bears the burden to establish that ‘(1) error exists, (2) the error is fundamental, and (3) the error caused him prejudice.’ ” ¶ 11 , (citations omitted).
State v. Wells Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Wells Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“Accordingly, [Wells] ‘bears the burden to establish that “(1) error exists, (2) the error is fundamental, and (3) the error caused him prejudice.”‘“ ¶ 11 (App. 2013) (citations omitted).
State v. Gulli 391 P.3d 1210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
State v. Gulli 391 P.3d 1210 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
“[I]nstructing a jury on a non-existent theory of criminal liability is fundamental error.”
State v. Mueller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Mueller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“Accordingly, [Mueller] ‘bears the burden to establish that “(1) error exists, (2) the error is fundamental, and (3) the error caused [her] prejudice.’” ¶ 11 (App. 2013) (citations omitted).
State v. Devorce Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Devorce Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
¶ 13 (App. 2013) (citation omitted).
State v. Lynam Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Lynam Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Under fundamental error review, Lynam “bears the burden to establish that ‘(1) error exists, (2) the error is fundamental, and (3) the error caused him prejudice.’” ¶ 11, (citations omitted).
State v. Matta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Matta Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Farr Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Farr Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Younan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Younan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Younan has the burden of establishing that: “(1) error exists, (2) the error is fundamental, and (3) the error caused him prejudice.” ¶ 11 (App. 2013).
State v. Russo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Russo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Under this standard of review, Defendant “bears the burden to establish that (1) error exists, (2) the error is fundamental, and (3) the error caused him prejudice.” ¶ 11 (App. 2013) (internal quotations and citations omitted).
State v. Krznarich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Krznarich Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
“Accordingly, [Krznarich] ‘bears the burden to establish that “(1) error exists, (2) the error is fundamental, and (3) the error caused him prejudice.”’” ¶ 11 (App. 2013) (citations omitted).
State v. Esposito Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Esposito Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
P. 21.3(c).6 “Accordingly, [Esposito] bears the burden to establish that (1) error exists, (2) the error is fundamental, and (3) the error caused him prejudice.” ¶ 11 (App. 2013) (citations omitted).
State v. Rustin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Jones Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“Accordingly, [Jones] ‘bears the burden to establish that “(1) error exists, (2) the error is fundamental, and (3) the error caused him prejudice.”’” ¶ 11, (citations omitted).
State v. Rustin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“Accordingly, [Rustin] ‘bears the burden to establish that “(1) error exists, (2) the error is fundamental, and (3) the error caused him prejudice.”’” ¶ 11, (citations omitted).
State v. Thompson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Thompson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“Accordingly, [Thompson] ‘bears the burden to establish that “(1) error exists, (2) the error is fundamental, and (3) the error caused him prejudice.”’” ¶ 11, (citations omitted).
State v. Black Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Black Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“Accordingly, [Black] ‘bears the burden to establish that “(1) error exists, (2) the error is fundamental, and (3) the error caused him prejudice.”’” ¶ 11, (citations omitted).
State v. Watson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Abbott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Watson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
4 STATE v. WATSON Decision of the Court him prejudice.”’” ¶ 11, (citations omitted).
State v. Abbott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
To show fundamental error, Abbott “bears the burden to establish that (1) error exists, (2) the error is fundamental, and (3) the error caused him prejudice.” ¶ 11 (App. 2013) (citations and internal quotations omitted).
State v. Felix 349 P.3d 1117 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Felix 349 P.3d 1117 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
A. Fundamental Error ¶ 14 “[Instructing a jury on a nonexistent theory of criminal liability is fundamental error.” ¶ 12 , ¶ 13
State v. Montelongo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Montelongo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“Accordingly, [the defendant] ‘bears the burden to establish that “(1) error exists, (2) the error is fundamental, and (3) the error caused him prejudice.”’” ¶ 11, (citations omitted).
State v. Valenzuela Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Valenzuela Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
–68, ¶¶ 19–20, –08 (2005); ¶ 11
State v. Cotham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Cotham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
“Accordingly, [the defendant] ‘bears the burden to establish that “(1) error exists, (2) the error is fundamental, and (3) the error caused him prejudice.”’” ¶ 11, (citations omitted).
State v. Kummer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Kummer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
¶ 11, (quotations and citations omitted).
State of Arizona v. Jose Raul Juarez-Orci 342 P.3d 856 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State of Arizona v. Jose Raul Juarez-Orci 342 P.3d 856 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
Accordingly, Juarez-Orci “‘bears the burden to establish that (1) error exists, (2) the error is fundamental, and (3) the error caused him prejudice.’”

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by