Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Bustamante, 274 P.3d 526.
- State of Arizona v. Richard Portugal Ortiz 360 P.3d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
- State v. Torres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Torres
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶ 15, (finding no error in allowing juror to be stricken); ¶ 17, (same).
- State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
-
State v. Brown
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶11 Step one of the Batson analysis was satisfied in this case when the court asked the prosecutor for a race-neutral explanation for the strike; by asking this question, “the judge implicitly found that [D]efendant had met his initial burden to make a prima facie case of intentional discrimination.” ¶ 16
- State of Arizona v. Louis John Felix 317 P.3d 1185 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
-
State of Arizona v. Louis John Felix
317 P.3d 1185
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
they were going to take [her] kids.” ¶10 Resolving all conflicts against Felix, the evidence was sufficient to support his kidnapping conviction.
- State v. Gonsalves 297 P.3d 927 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
-
State v. Gonsalves
297 P.3d 927
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
¶ 10 , (holding that where defendant was charged with misconduct involving weapons, in order to prove constructive possession over a gun on the driver’s side floorboard of a car, the State “bore the burden of proving that defendant 1) knew that the gun was on the driver’s side floorb