Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Bustamante, 274 P.3d 526.

59 citing documents.

  • State of Arizona v. Richard Portugal Ortiz 360 P.3d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
  • State v. Torres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Torres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    ¶ 15, (finding no error in allowing juror to be stricken); ¶ 17, (same).
  • State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
  • State v. Brown Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
    ¶11 Step one of the Batson analysis was satisfied in this case when the court asked the prosecutor for a race-neutral explanation for the strike; by asking this question, “the judge implicitly found that [D]efendant had met his initial burden to make a prima facie case of intentional discrimination.” ¶ 16
  • State of Arizona v. Louis John Felix 317 P.3d 1185 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
  • State of Arizona v. Louis John Felix 317 P.3d 1185 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
    they were going to take [her] kids.” ¶10 Resolving all conflicts against Felix, the evidence was sufficient to support his kidnapping conviction.
  • State v. Gonsalves 297 P.3d 927 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
  • State v. Gonsalves 297 P.3d 927 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
    ¶ 10 , (holding that where defendant was charged with misconduct involving weapons, in order to prove constructive possession over a gun on the driver’s side floorboard of a car, the State “bore the burden of proving that defendant 1) knew that the gun was on the driver’s side floorb