Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Adams, 745 P.2d 175.

26 citing documents.

State v. Harvey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Harvey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
§ 13-1602(A) (All forms of criminal damage require reckless mens rea except one: intentionally tampering with utility property.); -20 (App. 1987) (Liability for attempted crimes is limited to intentional conduct under Arizona law.).
State v. Reed 501 P.3d 748 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Reed 501 P.3d 748 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Attempt to commit a reckless act is not cognizable under Arizona law because “there is no such criminal offense as an attempt to achieve an unintended result.” ().
State of Arizona v. Allyn Akeem Smith 475 P.3d 558 Ariz. 2020
State of Arizona v. Allyn Akeem Smith 475 P.3d 558 Ariz. 2020
–22 (App. 1987) (finding no Confrontation 4 Smith now claims that the State raised the issue of whether MCAO’s charging decision was admissible for impeachment purposes.
State v. Rustin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Rustin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
See Delaware v. Fensterer, 474 U.S. 15, 20 (1985) (“Generally speaking, the Confrontation Clause guarantees an opportunity for effective cross-examination, not cross- examination that is effective in whatever way, and to whatever extent, the defense might wish.”); (concluding no Confrontation Clause violation occurred where defendant had “ample opportunity to put the victim’s credibility into issue”).
State of Arizona v. Adolfo Noel Ruiz, Jr. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State of Arizona v. Adolfo Noel Ruiz, Jr. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
He argued “there is no such crime as attempted heat of passion or sudden quarrel manslaughter,” -21, -80 (App. 1987), in which we held the offenses of attempted reckless manslaughter and attempted negligent homicide are not cognizable offenses in Arizona because one could not attempt to commit a crime that only required reckless conduct or criminal negligence and not a specific intent.
State v. Moore 189 P.3d 1107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
State v. Moore 189 P.3d 1107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
838 , 377 N.E.2d 28, 31 (1978)); , (similar).
State v. Nelson 150 P.3d 769 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Distinguished State v. Nelson 150 P.3d 769 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
2 ¶ 17 On appeal, , but that case is distinguishable.
State v. Ontiveros 81 P.3d 330 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
State v. Ontiveros 81 P.3d 330 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
this court held that attempted reckless manslaughter and *542 attempted negligent homicide are not cognizable offenses in Arizona.
State v. Sucharew 66 P.3d 59 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
State v. Sucharew 66 P.3d 59 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2003
State v. Curry 931 P.2d 1133 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Curry 931 P.2d 1133 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
we resolved whether attempted reckless manslaughter or attempted negligent homicide were cognizable offenses under our criminal code.
State v. Delgado 848 P.2d 337 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Delgado 848 P.2d 337 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Barnes 781 P.2d 69 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
State v. Barnes 781 P.2d 69 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
State v. Nunez 769 P.2d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State v. Nunez 769 P.2d 1040 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
the defendant was convicted of attempted second degree murder.