Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Wilhite, 772 P.2d 582.
- Riepe v. Riepe 91 P.3d 312 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
- State v. Seyrafi 32 P.3d 430 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
- State v. Seyrafi 32 P.3d 430 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2001
- State v. Flynt 13 P.3d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
-
State v. Flynt
13 P.3d 1209
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
We also construe statutory provisions “in light of their place in the statutory scheme,” , so “they may be harmonious and consistent.” State ex rel.
- State v. Wood 8 P.3d 1189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
-
State v. Wood
8 P.3d 1189
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Statutory provisions are to be “construed in context with related provisions and in light of their place in the statutory scheme.”
- State v. Riley 992 P.2d 1135 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
-
State v. Riley
992 P.2d 1135
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
1056 , 31 L.Ed.2d 340 (1972)
- Prudential v. Estate of Rojo-Pacheco 962 P.2d 213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
- Prudential v. Estate of Rojo-Pacheco 962 P.2d 213 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
- State v. Rodgers 909 P.2d 445 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
-
State v. Rodgers
909 P.2d 445
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
Consequently, “accident” must be construed according to its common usage, unless it has acquired some “peculiar or appropriate meaning in the law.” , A.R.S.
- State v. Wood 881 P.2d 1158 Ariz. 1994
-
State v. Wood
881 P.2d 1158
Ariz. 1994
1726, 1728 , 23 L.Ed.2d 284 (1969)
- Goulder v. ARIZONA DEPT. OF TRANSP., MOTOR VEH. 868 P.2d 997 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
- Goulder v. ARIZONA DEPT. OF TRANSP., MOTOR VEH. 868 P.2d 997 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
- Finck v. Superior Court 868 P.2d 1000 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
- Finck v. Superior Court 868 P.2d 1000 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
- Goulder v. Arizona Department of Transportation 868 P.2d 997 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
- Goulder v. Arizona Department of Transportation 868 P.2d 997 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
- State v. Ramsey 831 P.2d 408 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
-
State v. Ramsey
831 P.2d 408
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
this court examined the issue of whether a blood relationship was terminated by adoption.
- State v. Shearer 793 P.2d 86 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
- State v. Shearer 793 P.2d 86 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
- Hughes v. Creighton 798 P.2d 403 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
- Hughes v. Creighton 798 P.2d 403 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-4974 785 P.2d 1248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. JD-4974 785 P.2d 1248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
- State v. Castro 788 P.2d 1216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
- State v. Castro 788 P.2d 1216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989