Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Lee, 542 P.2d 413.
- State v. Vincent Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
State v. Vincent
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(State is 7 STATE v. VINCENT Decision of the Court permitted to produce similar acts or incidents to show defendant’s intent and prove act for which he is on trial was not inadvertent or by mistake.).
- State v. Torres-Mercado 955 P.2d 35 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
-
State v. Torres-Mercado
955 P.2d 35
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
-25 , -18 (1976) (stating that Ariz. R.Crim.
- State v. Guerrero 769 P.2d 1014 Ariz. 1989
-
State v. Guerrero
769 P.2d 1014
Ariz. 1989
1983); -67 , -80 (Ct.App.1982); -24 , -17 (1975)).
- State v. Guerrero 754 P.2d 327 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
- State v. Lukezic 691 P.2d 1088 Ariz. 1984
-
State v. Lukezic
691 P.2d 1088
Ariz. 1984
Annot., 57 A.L.R.2d 302 , 336, 343 (1958).
- State v. Waggoner 697 P.2d 345 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
- State v. Waggoner 697 P.2d 345 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
- State v. Young 661 P.2d 1138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
- State v. Young 661 P.2d 1138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
- State v. Thurman 657 P.2d 878 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
-
State v. Thurman
657 P.2d 878
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
the state next claims that when an actual violation of speedy trial limitation occurs, a defendant must make a motion to dismiss at least 20 days prior to the time set for trial, or be deemed to have waived his objection.
- State v. Neese 616 P.2d 959 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
-
State v. Neese
616 P.2d 959
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
* * * ” (Emphasis supplied) , this court discussed the applicability of Rule 16 to constitutional types of objection.
- State Ex Rel. Baumert v. Municipal Court of Phoenix 606 P.2d 33 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
- State Ex Rel. Baumert v. Municipal Court of Phoenix 606 P.2d 33 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
- State v. Stoglin 567 P.2d 1220 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
- State v. Stoglin 567 P.2d 1220 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
- State v. Gaitan 558 P.2d 746 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- State v. Gaitan 558 P.2d 746 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- State v. Pogue 557 P.2d 163 Ariz. 1976
- State v. Pogue 557 P.2d 163 Ariz. 1976
- State v. Gonzales 554 P.2d 904 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- State v. Gonzales 554 P.2d 904 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- State v. Raffaele 550 P.2d 1060 Ariz. 1976
-
State v. Raffaele
550 P.2d 1060
Ariz. 1976
587 , P.2d 413 (1975), it is incumbent upon the defense to make a timely motion.
- State v. Knaubert 550 P.2d 1095 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- State v. Knaubert 550 P.2d 1095 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976