Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Eliason, 544 P.2d 1124.
- State of Arizona v. Christina Marie George Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
- State of Arizona v. Christina Marie George Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
- State v. Marchesano 783 P.2d 247 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
-
State v. Marchesano
783 P.2d 247
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
§ 13-4035; , (reviewing court must search record for fundamental error); , (where evidence insufficient to support conviction, conviction vacated).
- State v. Prince 689 P.2d 542 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
-
State v. Prince
689 P.2d 542
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
489 , 62 L.Ed.2d 411 (1979)
- State v. Corrales 641 P.2d 1315 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
-
State v. Corrales
641 P.2d 1315
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
State v. Blankenship, supra.
- State v. Blankinship 622 P.2d 66 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
-
State v. Blankinship
622 P.2d 66
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
P.2d 1124 (1976) (judgment modified to misdemeanor theft).
- State v. Junkin 599 P.2d 244 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
- State v. Junkin 599 P.2d 244 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
- State v. Heberly 587 P.2d 260 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
- State v. Heberly 587 P.2d 260 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
- State v. Scigliano 583 P.2d 893 Ariz. 1978
-
State v. Scigliano
583 P.2d 893
Ariz. 1978
§§ 13-621(A), 13-1645,13-1716, 13-1717(A); , .
- State v. Gossett 583 P.2d 1364 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
- State v. Gossett 583 P.2d 1364 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
- State v. Doyle 571 P.2d 671 Ariz. 1977
-
State v. Doyle
571 P.2d 671
Ariz. 1977
Thus, “When the trial court’s determination is supported by substantial evidence, this Court will not substitute its evaluation of the evidence in an attempt to reach or justify a different conclusion.”
- State v. Chagnon 564 P.2d 401 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
- State v. Chagnon 564 P.2d 401 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
- State v. Widmer 569 P.2d 845 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
- State v. Widmer 569 P.2d 845 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
- State v. Moody 560 P.2d 1272 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Moody 560 P.2d 1272 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Sutton 553 P.2d 1216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
-
State v. Sutton
553 P.2d 1216
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
: “While the trial court, in addressing the defendant, did not mention individually each right and await the defendant’s reply, such a litany is not required.
- State v. Porter 550 P.2d 253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
-
State v. Porter
550 P.2d 253
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
“The reasonableness of the governmental invasion of the citizen’s personal security is the central inquiry in an investigatory stop such as this .