Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Sheaves, 747 P.2d 1237.

33 citing documents.

State v. Cabrera-Ortega Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Cabrera-Ortega Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
3 (finding that a fine is a criminal penalty).
State v. Watson 459 P.3d 120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Watson 459 P.3d 120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
§ 13-116’s prohibition on cumulative punishment, “sentencing court may not impose cumulative punishment for a single act”); (“The legislature enacted § 13-116 to protect a defendant from the imposition of multiple punishment[s] .
State v. Ayonayon 428 P.3d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Ayonayon 428 P.3d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
at 565, ¶ 31 , 225 P.3d at 1140 -41 (quoting State v. Sheaves , , 541, , 1240(App. 1987) ).
State v. McDonagh 304 P.3d 212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State v. McDonagh 304 P.3d 212 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Rogers v. Cota 219 P.3d 254 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Rogers v. Cota 219 P.3d 254 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
at 408 , 825 P.2d at 29 ( , ).
State of Arizona v. Payne Nelson Daniels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
State v. Payne 225 P.3d 1131 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
State v. Payne 225 P.3d 1131 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
“A fine is a pecuniary form of punishment or sum of money exacted from a person guilty of an offense.” , , (fine is “a pecuniary punishment imposed by a lawful tribunal upon a person convicted of a crime”); State v. Pitts, 26 Ariz.App.
State of Arizona v. Payne Nelson Daniels Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
“A fine is a pecuniary form of punishment or sum of money exacted from a person guilty of an offense.” see also Frazier v. Terrill, 65 Ariz. 131, 136, (fine is “a pecuniary punishment imposed by a lawful tribunal upon a person convicted of a crime”); Black’s Law Dictionary 664 (8th ed.
State v. Rodriguez 7 P.3d 148 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
State v. Rodriguez 7 P.3d 148 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2000
State v. Jenkins 970 P.2d 947 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
State v. Jenkins 970 P.2d 947 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1998
(criminal penalties, such as a fine or felony penalty assessment, are part of the sentence imposed under Rule 26.1(b)).
State v. Cook 916 P.2d 1074 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Cook 916 P.2d 1074 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Poundstone 880 P.2d 731 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State v. Poundstone 880 P.2d 731 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State v. Alexander 858 P.2d 680 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Alexander 858 P.2d 680 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Snead 854 P.2d 1183 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Snead 854 P.2d 1183 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
While the felony penalty assessment is itself part of the sentence and must be made at sentencing with the defendant present, , , Ariz.R.Crim.P.
State v. Anderson 827 P.2d 1129 Ariz. 1992
State v. Beltran 825 P.2d 27 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. Beltran 825 P.2d 27 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Like a fine, which has been established as a criminal penalty, , the surcharge on a fine is a criminal penalty.
State v. Marquez-Sosa 779 P.2d 815 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State v. Marquez-Sosa 779 P.2d 815 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
Rule 26.1, Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure
State v. Bedoni 779 P.2d 355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State v. Bedoni 779 P.2d 355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989