DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Von Reeden, 450 P.2d 702.

24 citing documents.

  • State v. Young 720 P.2d 965 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
  • State v. Young 720 P.2d 965 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
    See State v. Good, supra; , Corbin v. Broadman, 6 Ariz.App.
  • State v. Bruni 630 P.2d 1044 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
  • Distinguished State v. Bruni 630 P.2d 1044 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
    Appellant argues, , that these counts are not sufficiently distinguishable.
  • State v. Piedra 583 P.2d 1373 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
  • State v. Piedra 583 P.2d 1373 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
    in support of his proposition that a mistrial should have been declared.
  • Marston's, Inc. v. Strand 560 P.2d 778 Ariz. 1977
  • State v. Chavez 535 P.2d 26 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
  • State v. Chavez 535 P.2d 26 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
    Hansen v. United States, 393 F.2d 763 (8th Cir. 1968).
  • State v. Jacobson 524 P.2d 962 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
  • State v. Jacobson 524 P.2d 962 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1974
    158 , , State v. Abbott, 103 * P.2d 80 (1968).
  • State v. Thomas 514 P.2d 1023 Ariz. 1973
  • State v. Thomas 514 P.2d 1023 Ariz. 1973
    (1956); , 278 P. 63 (1929)
  • State v. Matlock 507 P.2d 118 Ariz. 1973
  • State v. Matlock 507 P.2d 118 Ariz. 1973
    The defendant, Matlock, relies, principally
  • State v. Aldridge 502 P.2d 1355 Ariz. 1972
  • State v. Aldridge 502 P.2d 1355 Ariz. 1972
    e. This discretion is not an arbitrary one but rather a legal discretion to be exercised to effect the ends of justice.’ *539 “While it is discretionary with the trial court whether to permit an unendorsed witness to testify, the exercise of such discretion must be consonant with the purpose of the rule, which purpose is to enable an accused to advisedly prepare his defense.”
  • State v. Miller 491 P.2d 485 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
  • State v. Miller 491 P.2d 485 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
  • State v. Gause 489 P.2d 830 Ariz. 1971
  • State v. Gause 489 P.2d 830 Ariz. 1971
  • State v. Smith 482 P.2d 863 Ariz. 1971
  • State v. Reeden 477 P.2d 240 Ariz. 1970
  • State v. Reeden 477 P.2d 240 Ariz. 1970
    The Court of Appeals, , , on February 25, 1969, reversed for a new trial the embezzlement convictions and such charges were dismissed.