Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Reyes, 307 P.3d 35.

124 citing documents.

State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Orona-Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Orona-Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶3 Although not raised in the opening brief, ¶ 14, this court held that Arizona Revised Statutes section 13-610 (2014) does not authorize the superior court to impose a DNA collection fee on a convicted defendant.
State v. Mekhail Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Mekhail Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. McDonald Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. McDonald Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Wade Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Baker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Garcia-Quintana 321 P.3d 432 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Wade Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Garcia-Quintana 321 P.3d 432 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Baker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
See, ¶ 9, (internal quotation marks omitted).
State v. Woods Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Woods Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
After the court so ruled, ¶ 14, that there is no basis under that section to require a convicted defendant to pay the cost of his DNA testing.
State v. Morgan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Morgan Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
The State concedes that, P.3d 35 (App. 2013), the trial court erred in ordering Appellant to pay the cost of DNA testing.
State v. Conner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Conner Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Valdespino Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Gallegos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Valdespino Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Gallegos Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
(holding that there is no basis under A.R.S.