DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Garcia, 334 P.3d 1286.

30 citing documents.

  • State of Arizona v. Bayron Perez Agueda 513 P.3d 1112 Ariz. 2022
  • State of Arizona v. Bayron Perez Agueda 513 P.3d 1112 Ariz. 2022
    ¶12 Under Arizona law, “[a] lesser-included offense is one ‘composed solely of some but not all of the elements of the greater crime so that it is impossible to have committed the crime charged without having committed the lesser one.’” Lua, 237 Ariz. at 303 ¶ 7 (); –30 ¶ 6 (App. 2014) (“[T]he greater offense must require each element of the lesser offense plus one or more additional elements not required by the lesser offense.”)
  • State of Arizona v. Bobby Ray Carter Jr 469 P.3d 449 Ariz. 2020
  • State of Arizona v. Bobby Ray Carter Jr 469 P.3d 449 Ariz. 2020
    ¶5 The court of appeals’ analysis of the relationship between theft, vehicle theft
  • State v. Watson 459 P.3d 120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
  • State v. Watson 459 P.3d 120 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
    See Illinois v. Vitale, 447 U.S. 410, 421 (1980); ¶ 5 (App. 2014); –63, ¶¶ 10–13 (App. 1998).
  • State v. Eisenmann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • State v. Eisenmann Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    ¶ 10 (App. 2014) (“There is no suggestion in this broad definition [under A.R.S.
  • State v. Carter 429 P.3d 1176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
  • State v. Carter 429 P.3d 1176 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2018
    State v. Garcia ¶15 As he did at sentencing, Carter relies on State v. Garcia , , to argue his three convictions involving the SUV and his two convictions relating to the tractor constituted double jeopardy.
  • State v. Figueroa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • State v. Figueroa Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    6 STATE v. FIGUEROA Decision of the Court ¶25 ¶ 11 (App. 2014), we held that theft of means of transportation is a lesser-included offense of armed robbery.
  • State v. Lister Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • State v. Lister Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    § 13-2510; 5 STATE v. LISTER Decision of the Court ¶ 8 (App. 2014) (explaining that the subsections in such a statute do not refer to separate crimes but rather describe different ways of committing the same single offense
  • State v. Barrow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
  • State v. Barrow Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
    See Illinois v. Vitale, 447 U.S. 410, 421 (1980); ¶ 5 (App. 2014); State v. Chabolla–Hinojosa, –63, ¶¶ 10–13 (App. 1998).
  • State v. Cope 387 P.3d 746 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
  • State v. Cope 387 P.3d 746 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
    ¶ 5 (App. 2014); see U.S. Const. amend.
  • State of Arizona v. Penny Ann West 362 P.3d 1049 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
  • State of Arizona v. Penny Ann West 362 P.3d 1049 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
  • State v. Wise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Wise Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    Under Arizona law, a lesser-included offense is “one ‘composed solely of some but not all of the elements of the greater crime so that it is impossible to have committed the crime charged without having committed the lesser one.” ¶ 7 (2015) (); -30 (App. 2014) (“[T]he greater offense must require each element of the lesser offense plus one or more additional elements not required by the lesser offense.”) ( ¶ 39 (App. 2001), ¶ 6 (App. 1998)).
  • State of Arizona v. Phillip Gregory Speers 361 P.3d 952 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
  • State of Arizona v. Phillip Gregory Speers 361 P.3d 952 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
    (because “current definitions of contributing to the delinquency of a minor and child molesting are identical to the former definitions of those crimes, .
  • State v. Lebario Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Lebario Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    ¶ 11 (App. 2014), issued after the Maricopa County superior court sentenced Lebario in this case, this court held that theft of means of transportation is a lesser-included offense of armed robbery.
  • State of Arizona v. Francisco Xavier Veloz 342 P.3d 1272 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
  • State of Arizona v. Francisco Xavier Veloz 342 P.3d 1272 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
  • State v. Erivez 341 P.3d 514 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Erivez 341 P.3d 514 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
    ¶14 A lesser-included offense is “one composed solely of some but not all of the elements of the greater crime so that it is impossible to have committed the [greater] crime charged without having committed the lesser one.” ¶ 11, (citation omitted); -30, ¶ 6, -89 (App. 2014).