Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Reynolds, 466 P.2d 405.

51 citing documents.

Stafford v. Burns 389 P.3d 76 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
Stafford v. Burns 389 P.3d 76 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
BURNS et al. Opinion of the Court ¶22 Not every violation of the court’s admonitions requires dismissal of the juror involved, and the trial court is in the best position to determine the effect, if any, of a juror’s misconduct, ().
State v. Kennedy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Kennedy Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State of Arizona v. Tywan Demetrius Woods 348 P.3d 910 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State v. Dixon 622 P.2d 501 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
State v. Dixon 622 P.2d 501 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2006
Appellant’s argument that elimination of a , 466 P,2d 405 (1970), decided under the previous criminal code in which theft and receiving stolen goods were separate and mutually exclusive offenses, and thus inapposite.
Jones v. Kiger 984 P.2d 1161 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
Jones v. Kiger 984 P.2d 1161 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
¶ 15 One case, , might be interpreted to support the State’s position.
Miller v. Superior Court 938 P.2d 1128 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Miller v. Superior Court 938 P.2d 1128 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
Jeopardy attaches when a criminal trial begins and, “unless [it is] removed for some legal reason, the one in jeopardy cannot be again tried for the same offense.” , ( , ).
State v. Rojas 868 P.2d 1037 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
State v. Rojas 868 P.2d 1037 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
“When events occur that cast an irrevocable cloud over the jury’s fairness and impartiality, it is far better to grant the motion for mistrial and start over again.”
State v. Reasoner 742 P.2d 1363 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Reasoner 742 P.2d 1363 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
On appeal, appellant argues that the court abused its discretion in refusing to strike the entire panel
Cota v. Harley Davidson, a Div. of AMF, Inc. 684 P.2d 888 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
Cota v. Harley Davidson, a Div. of AMF, Inc. 684 P.2d 888 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
State v. Montano 667 P.2d 1320 Ariz. 1983
State v. Montano 667 P.2d 1320 Ariz. 1983
State v. Keel 672 P.2d 197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Keel 672 P.2d 197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Shumway 672 P.2d 944 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Shumway 672 P.2d 944 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Platt 637 P.2d 1073 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Platt 637 P.2d 1073 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Berge 634 P.2d 947 Ariz. 1981
State v. Berge 634 P.2d 947 Ariz. 1981
State v. Teran 635 P.2d 870 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Teran 635 P.2d 870 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Shepherd 555 P.2d 1136 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
State v. Shepherd 555 P.2d 1136 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
wherein we stated: “Insofar as possible, however, both the State and the defendant are entitled to a fair and impartial jury.
State v. Vitale 530 P.2d 394 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
State v. Vitale 530 P.2d 394 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
State v. Duke 518 P.2d 570 Ariz. 1974
State v. Duke 518 P.2d 570 Ariz. 1974
This action should not be taken lightly, but when the interest of justice so demands, it should nevertheless be done.”
City of Tucson v. Valencia 517 P.2d 106 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
City of Tucson v. Valencia 517 P.2d 106 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
State v. Jung 506 P.2d 648 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
State v. Jung 506 P.2d 648 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
State v. Reynolds 503 P.2d 369 Ariz. 1972
State v. Reynolds 503 P.2d 369 Ariz. 1972
Klinefelter v. Superior Court, County of Maricopa 502 P.2d 531 Ariz. 1972
Klinefelter v. Superior Court, County of Maricopa 502 P.2d 531 Ariz. 1972
where the trial court properly granted the prosecutor’s motion for a mistrial over the objection of the defendant when a previous contempt citation of the defendant was reported in the newspapers and some of the jurors read the newspaper article.
State Ex Rel. Flournoy v. Wren 498 P.2d 444 Ariz. 1972
State Ex Rel. Flournoy v. Wren 498 P.2d 444 Ariz. 1972
See Bowling v. State, 219 Tenn.
State v. Melcher 487 P.2d 3 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
State v. Melcher 487 P.2d 3 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
State v. Ross 485 P.2d 810 Ariz. 1971
State v. Ross 485 P.2d 810 Ariz. 1971
Rule 272, Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S.
State v. Mojarro Padilla 483 P.2d 549 Ariz. 1971