State v. Sain
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State of Arizona v. Phil Gutierrez 229 Ariz. 573
- 227 Ariz. 537 not in our corpus
- 260 P.3d 1102 not in our corpus
Opinion text
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.
UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL
AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.
IN THE
ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,
v.
BILLY BART SAIN, Petitioner.
No. 1 CA-CR 21-0245 PRPC
FILED 10-28-2021
Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County
No. CR2017-109585-001
The Honorable Christopher Whitten, Judge
REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED
APPEARANCES
Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix
By Amanda M. Parker
Counsel for Respondent
Billy Bart Sain, Yuma
Petitioner
MEMORANDUM DECISION
Presiding Judge D. Steven Williams, Judge David B. Gass, and Judge
James B. Morse Jr. delivered the decision of the Court.
STATE v. SAIN
Decision of the Court
PER CURIAM:
¶1 Petitioner Billy Bart Sain seeks review of the superior court’s
order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. This is petitioner’s
first petition.
¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will
not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction
relief. State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012).
It is petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its
discretion by denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v.
Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1, 260 P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has
burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).
¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior
court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the
petition for review. The petitioner has failed to show an abuse of
discretion.
¶4 For the foregoing reasons, this court grants review but
denies relief.
AMY M. WOOD • Clerk of the Court
FILED: AA
2