State v. Twiggs
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State of Arizona v. Phil Gutierrez 229 Ariz. 573
- 227 Ariz. 537 not in our corpus
Opinion text
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.
UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL
AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.
IN THE
ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,
v.
DONNIE ROMONE TWIGGS, Petitioner.
No. 1 CA-CR 21-0315 PRPC
FILED 1-18-2022
Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Mohave County
No. S8015CR201801789
The Honorable Billy K. Sipe, Jr., Judge Pro Tempore
REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED
COUNSEL
Mohave County Attorney’s Office, Kingman
By Matthew J. Smith
Counsel for Respondent
Donnie Romone Twiggs, Tucson
Petitioner
STATE v. TWIGGS
Decision of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
Presiding Judge Peter B. Swann, Judge David D. Weinzweig and Judge Paul
J. McMurdie delivered the decision of the Court.
PER CURIAM:
¶1 Petitioner Donnie Romone Twiggs seeks review of the
superior court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. This
is petitioner’s first petition.
¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will
not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief.
State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to
show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition
for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1 (App. 2011)
(petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).
¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior
court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition
for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of
discretion.
¶4 We grant review and deny relief.
AMY M. WOOD • Clerk of the Court
FILED: AA
2