State v. Isom

NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.
UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL
AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE
ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

KEVIN ANDREW ISOM, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 21-0416 PRPC
FILED 2-8-2022

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County
No. CR2017-110429-001
The Honorable Ronda R. Fisk, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED AND RELIEF DENIED

APPEARANCES

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix
By Amanda M. Parker
Counsel for Respondent

Kevin Andrew Isom, Buckeye
Petitioner
 STATE v. ISOM
Decision of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Jennifer B. Campbell, Judge Randall M. Howe, and Judge
James B. Morse Jr. delivered the decision of the Court.

P E R C U R I A M:

¶1 Petitioner Kevin Andrew Isom seeks review of the superior
court’s order denying his third petition for post-conviction relief.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this Court will
not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief.
State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to
show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition
for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1 (App. 2011)
(petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior
court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition
for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of
discretion.

¶4 We grant review but deny relief.

AMY M. WOOD • Clerk of the Court
FILED: AA

2