State v. Boyce

NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.
UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL
AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE
ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

ANTONNEO R. BOYCE, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 23-0005 PRPC
FILED 5-16-2023

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Yavapai County
No. P1300CR201301294
The Honorable Debra R. Phelan, Judge Pro Tempore

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

APPEARANCES

Yavapai County Attorney’s Office, Prescott
By Lindsey Hannan
Counsel for Respondent

Antonneo R. Boyce, Yarnell
Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Vice Chief Judge David B. Gass, Judge Brian Y. Furuya, and Judge Andrew
M. Jacobs delivered the decision of the court.
 STATE v. BOYCE
Decision of the Court

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Antonneo Renea Boyce seeks review of the superior
court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. This is
petitioner’s fourth petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will
not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief.
State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is
petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by
denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz.
537, ¶ 1, 260 P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of
establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior
court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, the petition for
review, the response, and the reply. We find that petitioner has not
established an abuse of discretion.

¶4 We grant review and deny relief.

AMY M. WOOD • Clerk of the Court
FILED: AA

2