State v. Lofton
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State of Arizona v. Phil Gutierrez 278 P.3d 1276
Opinion text
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.
UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL
AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.
IN THE
ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,
v.
JOHN EDWARD LOFTON, JR., Petitioner.
No. 1 CA-CR 23-0269 PRPC
FILED 11-02-2023
Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County
No. CR 1987-009127
The Honorable Ronee Korbin Steiner, Judge
REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED
COUNSEL
Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix
By Faith Cheree Klepper
Counsel for Respondent
The Stavis Law Firm, PLLC, Scottsdale
By Christopher Stavris
Counsel for Petitioner
MEMORANDUM DECISION
Presiding Judge David D. Weinzweig, Judge Michael S. Catlett, and Judge
Maria Elena Cruz delivered the decision of the Court.
STATE v. LOFTON
Decision of the Court
PER CURIAM:
¶1 Petitioner John Edward Lofton, Jr. seeks review of the
superior court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. This
is petitioner’s fourth successive petition.
¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will
not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief.
State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to
show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition
for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App.
2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).
¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior
court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition
for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of
discretion.
¶4 We grant review and deny relief.
AMY M. WOOD • Clerk of the Court
FILED: TM
2