State v. May
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Leon 451 P.2d 878
- State v. Clark 2 P.3d 89
- State v. Shattuck 684 P.2d 154
Opinion text
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.
UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL
AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.
IN THE
ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL DEAN MAY, Appellant.
No. 1 CA-CR 23-0301
FILED 10-24-2024
Appeal from the Superior Court in Yavapai County
No. VI300CR202180452
The Honorable Michael R. Bluff, Judge
AFFIRMED
COUNSEL
Arizona Attorney General’s Office, Phoenix
By Celeste Kinney
Counsel for Appellee
Zickerman Law Office, Flagstaff
By Adam Zickerman
Counsel for Appellant
STATE v. MAY
Decision of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
Judge Samuel A. Thumma delivered the decision of the Court, in which
Presiding Judge Maria Elena Cruz and Judge Andrew M. Jacobs joined.
T H U M M A, Judge:
¶1 This is an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
and State v. Leon, 104 Ariz. 297 (1969). Counsel for defendant Michael May
has advised the court that, after searching the entire record, he has found
no arguable question of law and asks the court to conduct an Anders review
of the record. May was given the opportunity to personally file a
supplemental brief, with October 8, 2024 being the extended deadline for
such a filing (given an issue with his mailing address). May, however, did
not personally file a supplemental brief. This court has reviewed the record
and has found no reversible error. Thus, May’s convictions and resulting
sentences are affirmed.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶2 May was charged with five offenses alleged to have been
committed in March 2021 in Yavapai County. After trial, a jury found May
guilty of two counts of reckless child abuse, Class 5 non-dangerous but
repetitive felonies (Counts 1 and 2) and possession of dangerous drugs, a
Class 4 non-dangerous but repetitive felony (Count 3). May was found not
guilty of possession of drug paraphernalia, a Class 6 felony (Count 4). May
pled guilty to Count 5, misconduct involving weapons, a Class 4 felony.
¶3 At a July 2023 sentencing, the court considered information
and argument presented, including May’s prior criminal history and
presentence investigation report. The court sentenced May to a prison term
of 1 year for Count 1; a concurrent prison term of 1 year for Count 2; a
consecutive prison term of 2.5 years for Count 3 and a prison term of 2.5
years on Count 5, concurrent with the prison term for Count 3. The court
properly awarded May 32 days of presentence incarceration credit and
imposed $889 for various assessments. This court has jurisdiction over
May’s timely appeal pursuant to Article 6, Section 9, of the Arizona
Constitution and Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) sections 12-
120.21(A)(1), 13-4031 and 13-4033(A)(2024).
2
STATE v. MAY
Decision of the Court
DISCUSSION
¶4 The record shows that May was represented by counsel at all
stages of the proceedings and that counsel was present at all critical stages.
The record contains substantial evidence supporting the verdict. The prison
sentence imposed was within statutory limits, and presentence
incarceration credit was correct. And in all other respects, from the record
presented, all proceedings were conducted in compliance with the Arizona
Rules of Criminal Procedure.
CONCLUSION
¶5 This court has read and considered counsel’s brief and has
searched the record provided for reversible error and has found none. Leon,
204 Ariz. at 300; State v. Clark, 196 Ariz. 530, 537 ¶ 30 (App. 1999).
Accordingly, May’s convictions and resulting sentences are affirmed.
¶6 Upon the filing of this decision, defense counsel is directed to
inform May of the status of the appeal and of his future options. Defense
counsel has no further obligations unless, upon review, counsel identifies
an issue appropriate for submission to the Arizona Supreme Court by
petition for review. See State v. Shattuck, 140 Ariz. 582, 584-85 (1984). May
has 30 days from the date of this decision to proceed, if he desires, with a
self-represented motion for reconsideration or petition for review.
AMY M. WOOD • Clerk of the Court
FILED: AGFV
3