State v. Walton
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State of Arizona v. Phil Gutierrez 278 P.3d 1276
Opinion text
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.
UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL
AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.
IN THE
ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,
v.
GEARY WAYNE WALTON, Petitioner.
No. 1 CA-CR 25-0062 PRPC
FILED 01-27-2026
Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County
No. CR0000-097176
The Honorable Pamela Hearn Dunne, Judge
REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED
COUNSEL
Geary Wayne Walton, Florence
Petitioner
MEMORANDUM DECISION
Presiding Judge James B. Morse Jr., Judge Anni Hill Foster, and Judge
Veronika Fabian delivered the following decision.
STATE v. WALTON
Decision of the Court
PER CURIAM:
¶1 Petitioner Geary Wayne Walton, seeks review of the superior
court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant
to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is Walton’s eighteenth
petition.
¶2 We will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for
post-conviction relief absent an abuse of discretion or legal error. See State
v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). Walton has the burden to show
that the superior court erred in denying his petition for post-conviction
relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011).
¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior
court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, petition for
review. Walton has not established error.
¶4 We grant review but deny relief.
MATTHEW J. MARTIN • Clerk of the Court
FILED: JT
2