State v. Struebing

NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.
UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL
AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE
ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS
DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

CHARLES STRUEBING, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 25-0265 PRPC
FILED 02-11-2026

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County
Nos. CR2009-048714-001, CR2009-122465-001
The Honorable Geoffrey H. Fish, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Charles Struebing, Buckeye, Petitioner
Petitioner
 STATE v. STRUEBING
Decision of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Michael S. Catlett, Judge Jennifer M. Perkins, and Judge
Angela K. Paton delivered the following decision.

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Charles Struebing seeks review of the superior
court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant
to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 33.1. This is Struebing’s third
successive petition.

¶2 We will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for
post-conviction relief absent an abuse of discretion or legal error. See State
v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). Struebing has the burden to show
that the superior court erred in denying the petition for post-conviction
relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior
court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition
for review. The petitioner has not established error.

¶4 We grant review but deny relief.

MATTHEW J. MARTIN • Clerk of the Court
FILED: JR

2