Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Vaughn, 471 P.2d 744.
- State v. Howard 785 P.2d 1235 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
-
State v. Howard
785 P.2d 1235
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Hansen v. Garcia, Fletcher, Lund and McVean
- State v. Lopez 754 P.2d 300 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
- Hansen v. Garcia, Fletcher, Lund and McVean 713 P.2d 1263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
- Hansen v. Garcia, Fletcher, Lund and McVean 713 P.2d 1263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
- State v. Sanchez 701 P.2d 597 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
-
State v. Sanchez
701 P.2d 597
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
218 , 306 N.W.2d 906 (1981); Bey v. State, 355 So.2d 850 (Fla.App.1978)
- State v. Turner 688 P.2d 1030 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
-
State v. Turner
688 P.2d 1030
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
State v. Pine, 8 Ariz.App.
- State v. Harney 625 P.2d 944 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
-
State v. Harney
625 P.2d 944
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
The cases cited by the defendant, , , deal with searches pursuant to a lawful arrest and are inapposite to the question of resistance sufficient to prevent an arrest.
- State v. Clovis 618 P.2d 245 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
- State v. Clovis 618 P.2d 245 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
- State v. Pickett 613 P.2d 837 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
- State v. Pickett 613 P.2d 837 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
- State v. Armijo 549 P.2d 616 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- State v. Armijo 549 P.2d 616 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- State v. Miller 537 P.2d 965 Ariz. 1975
- State v. Miller 537 P.2d 965 Ariz. 1975
- State v. Roman 518 P.2d 586 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
- State v. Roman 518 P.2d 586 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
- State v. Hutton 505 P.2d 263 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
-
State v. Hutton
505 P.2d 263
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
see, , and State v. DeRoss, 9 Ariz.App.
- State v. Taras 504 P.2d 548 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
-
State v. Taras
504 P.2d 548
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
1098 , 91 L. Ed. 1399 (1947)
- State Ex Rel. Flournoy v. Wren 498 P.2d 444 Ariz. 1972
-
State Ex Rel. Flournoy v. Wren
498 P.2d 444
Ariz. 1972
168 , 4 L.Ed.2d 134 (1959)
- State v. Durham 495 P.2d 463 Ariz. 1972
-
State v. Durham
495 P.2d 463
Ariz. 1972
An arrest can be completed by the utterance of words advising the person to be arrested that he is under arrest, followed by submission to custody or control, or by the actual physical restraint of a person without the pronouncement of the formula words “you are under arrest.” , .
- Campbell v. Superior Court 479 P.2d 685 Ariz. 1971
-
Campbell v. Superior Court
479 P.2d 685
Ariz. 1971
the Court of Appeals reviewed the requirements for probable cause to make an arrest without a warrant.