DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Olivas, 579 P.2d 60.

34 citing documents.

  • State Kingston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
  • State Kingston Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
    ct and circumstantial evidence are equally probative, n.1 (1993), and wholly circumstantial evidence can support differing, yet reasonable inferences, State v. Anaya, 3 STATE v. KINGSTON Decision of the Court
  • State v. Rose Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
  • State v. Rose Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
    Further, because circumstantial evidence can support differing, yet reasonable inferences, the mere existence of an inference of innocence from circumstantial evidence does not warrant a directed verdict of acquittal
  • State v. Bailey 800 P.2d 982 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
  • State v. Bailey 800 P.2d 982 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
  • State v. Crane 799 P.2d 1380 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
  • State v. Crane 799 P.2d 1380 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
  • State v. Bedoni 779 P.2d 355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
  • State v. Bedoni 779 P.2d 355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
  • State v. Wagstaff 775 P.2d 1130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
  • State v. Wagstaff 775 P.2d 1130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
    APPEAL The facts, taken in a light most favorable to sustaining the verdict below, see, , are as follows.
  • State v. Sinclair 768 P.2d 655 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
  • State v. Sinclair 768 P.2d 655 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
    The facts that follow are viewed in the light most favorable to sustaining the trial court’s order, , and are based on the evidence presented at the hearing on defendant’s motion to suppress.
  • State v. Walters 748 P.2d 777 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
  • State v. Walters 748 P.2d 777 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
    PACTS The facts, in a light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, , are as follows.
  • State v. White 747 P.2d 613 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
  • State v. White 747 P.2d 613 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
  • State v. Doolittle 746 P.2d 924 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
  • State v. Doolittle 746 P.2d 924 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
  • State v. Stuck 739 P.2d 1333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
  • State v. Stuck 739 P.2d 1333 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
  • State v. Bojorquez 729 P.2d 965 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
  • State v. Bojorquez 729 P.2d 965 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
  • State v. Fatty 724 P.2d 1256 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
  • State v. Fatty 724 P.2d 1256 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
  • State v. Nash 694 P.2d 222 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Nash 694 P.2d 222 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Schad 633 P.2d 366 Ariz. 1981
  • State v. Schad 633 P.2d 366 Ariz. 1981
    ” 129 Ariz. a 554-555, 633 P.2d at 363-364.
  • State v. Tison 633 P.2d 355 Ariz. 1981
  • State v. Tison 633 P.2d 355 Ariz. 1981
  • State v. Blevins 623 P.2d 853 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
  • State v. Blevins 623 P.2d 853 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981