DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Cummings, 583 P.2d 1389.

32 citing documents.

  • State v. Guadagni 178 P.3d 473 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
  • State v. Guadagni 178 P.3d 473 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2008
    -18 (App.2003); , , -71 , -91 (App.1978).
  • Demarce v. Willrich 56 P.3d 76 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
  • Demarce v. Willrich 56 P.3d 76 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
    For example, , the court upheld a term of probation, that required the defendant to make restitution for a loss that occurred in a prior burglary.
  • State v. Lindsley 953 P.2d 1248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
  • State v. Lindsley 953 P.2d 1248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1997
    While a trial court may impose restitution for crimes admitted by defendant but uncharged by the State, , no restitution may be imposed for an uncharged offense that has not been admitted by defendant and for which there is no supporting evidence before the trial court or for which the defendant has not agreed to pay restitution.
  • State v. Holguin 870 P.2d 407 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
  • State v. Holguin 870 P.2d 407 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
    see State v. Moore, 149 Ariz; 176, 177, (restitution cannot be imposed independently of sentencing); , (restitution is part of sentencing process).
  • State v. Barrs 833 P.2d 713 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
  • State v. Barrs 833 P.2d 713 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
    Restitution is part of a defendant’s sentence, , and must be set forth in the oral pronouncement of sentence.
  • State v. West 845 P.2d 1097 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
  • State v. West 845 P.2d 1097 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
    at 302, 665 P.2d at 1024
  • State v. Lewus 825 P.2d 471 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
  • State v. Lewus 825 P.2d 471 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
    Restitution is part of the sentencing process, , and once the defendant has been convicted, the trial judge shall order restitution for the amount of loss the criminal violation caused.
  • State v. Fancher 818 P.2d 251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
  • State v. Fancher 818 P.2d 251 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
    Restitution is part of the sentencing process, , and “once the defendant has been convicted[,] the trial judge may order restitution for the amount of loss [the court] finds the criminal violation caused.” United States v. Sleight, 808 F.2d 1012, 1016 (3d Cir.1987) (quoting United States v. Lemire, 720 F.2d 1327, 1353 (D.C.Cir.1
  • State v. Iniguez 821 P.2d 194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
  • State v. Iniguez 821 P.2d 194 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
    at 302, 665 P.2d at 1024
  • State v. Pearce 751 P.2d 603 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
  • State v. Pearce 751 P.2d 603 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
  • State v. Henderson 717 P.2d 933 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
  • State v. Henderson 717 P.2d 933 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1986
  • State v. Turner 688 P.2d 1030 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
  • State v. Turner 688 P.2d 1030 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
    State v. Montgomery, supra
  • State v. Young 670 P.2d 1189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
  • State v. Young 670 P.2d 1189 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
  • State v. Balsam 636 P.2d 1234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
  • State v. Balsam 636 P.2d 1234 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
  • State v. Smith 628 P.2d 65 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
  • State v. Smith 628 P.2d 65 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
  • State v. Reese 603 P.2d 104 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
  • State v. Reese 603 P.2d 104 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979