Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Ballinger, 504 P.2d 955.

33 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II 359 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II 359 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
at 272 , 921 P.2d at 675 ; -35 , -58 (1973); State v. McMann, 3 Ariz.App.
State v. Cheramie 171 P.3d 1253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
State v. Tarango 895 P.2d 1009 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Tarango 895 P.2d 1009 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Villalobos Alvarez 745 P.2d 991 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Villalobos Alvarez 745 P.2d 991 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
Circumstantial evidence is acceptable in proving constructive possession
State v. Wilson 658 P.2d 204 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Wilson 658 P.2d 204 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Hadd 619 P.2d 1047 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
State v. Hadd 619 P.2d 1047 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
State v. Warren 589 P.2d 1338 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Warren 589 P.2d 1338 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Donovan 568 P.2d 1107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Donovan 568 P.2d 1107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Henderson 569 P.2d 252 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Henderson 569 P.2d 252 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Marquez 558 P.2d 692 Ariz. 1976
State v. Marquez 558 P.2d 692 Ariz. 1976
State v. White 549 P.2d 600 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. White 549 P.2d 600 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Warness 548 P.2d 853 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Warness 548 P.2d 853 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
approved seizure of a marijuana roach found in an ashtray while the police were investigating a family squabble.
State v. Eliason 544 P.2d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Eliason 544 P.2d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. McMann, 3 Ariz.App.
State v. Wright 543 P.2d 434 Ariz. 1975
State v. Wright 543 P.2d 434 Ariz. 1975
City of Tucson v. Valencia, 21 Ariz.App.
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action J-72773S 527 P.2d 305 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
In re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action J-72773S 527 P.2d 305 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
either actual physical possession or constructive possession with actual knowledge of the presence of the narcotic substance.”
City of Tucson v. Valencia 517 P.2d 106 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
City of Tucson v. Valencia 517 P.2d 106 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
Division One of this court concluded that it could not decide a mistrial — double jeopardy claim because the defendant had not forwarded a transcript of the first trial.
State v. Haynie 505 P.2d 1074 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
State v. Haynie 505 P.2d 1074 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973