Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Ramirez, 616 P.2d 924.

257 citing documents.

State v. Goc Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
P. 33.16(c)(2)(B) (petition for review must contain issues decided by trial court that defendant is presenting for review); (court of appeals does not address issues raised for first time in petition for review).
State v. Shoemaker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Shoemaker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
P. 33.16(c)(2)(B) (petition for review must contain issues decided by superior court that defendant is presenting for review); (court of appeals does not address issues raised for first time in petition for review).
State v. Anderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Anderson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
P. 33.16(c)(2)(B); 3 STATE v. ANDERSON Decision of the Court ¶¶ 40–41 (App. 2007) (both holding there is no review for fundamental error in a
State v. Kittrell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Kittrell Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
(raising issues for the first time in motion for rehearing is improper).
State v. Jacott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Jacott Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
P. 32.9(c)(4)(B); –78 (App. 1991); (holding there is no review for fundamental error in a post-conviction relief proceeding).
State v. Norris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Norris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
P. 32.9(c)(4)(B)(ii), (D)
State v. Aranda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Aranda Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
P. 32.9(c)(4)(B)(ii); (declining to address issues not presented to the trial court).
State v. Tucker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Tucker Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
(issues not presented in superior court may not be first raised in petition for review).
State v. Covarrubias Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Covarrubias Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
P. 32.9(c)(4)(B); ¶ 42 (App. 2007) (both holding there is no review for fundamental error in a post-conviction relief proceeding).
State v. Benjamin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Benjamin Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Czarniecki Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Czarniecki Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
See Rule 32.9(4)(B)(ii) (petition for review shall contain issues which were decided by the trial court)
State v. Chavez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Chavez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Carson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Carson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
P. 32.9(c)(1)(ii) (requiring that a petition for post-conviction relief contain “issues which were decided by the trial court and which the defendant wishes to present to the appellate court for review”); ¶¶ 40-41, (holding there is no review for fundamental error in a post-conviction relief proceeding).
State v. Jackson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Jackson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
P. 32.9(c)(1)(ii); approved as modified, P.2d 118 (1990)
State v. Roper Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Roper Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
P. 32.9(c)(1)(ii); approved as modified, (declining to consider ineffective assistance of counsel claim where petitioner failed to specify how superior court erred, denying the superior court “an opportunity to review meritorious issues”); (declining to hear issues not first decided by the superior court).
State v. Hibbler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Hibbler Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Faccio Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Faccio Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
P. 32.9(c)(1); approved as modified
State v. Witherspoon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Witherspoon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Ramirez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Ramirez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
P. 32.9 (c)(1); approved as modified, P.2d 118 (1990)
State v. Valdez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Valdez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
(amendment to pleadings only permitted prior to trial court’s ruling dismissing petition).
State v. Briseno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Torres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Briseno Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
P. 32.9(c)(1)(ii) (limiting the petition for review to “issues which were decided by the trial court and which the defendant wishes to present to the appellate court for review.”); -74, ¶ 8 (App. 2014) ().
State v. Torres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Torres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Torres Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
modified on other grounds, P.2d 118 (1990); -78, -39 (App. 1991); Ariz. R. Crim.
State v. Rojo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Rojo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-78, 3 STATE v. ROJO Decision of the Court -39 (App. 1991)
State v. Thomas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Roman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Roman Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
(“Appellate courts will review only those matters which appear in the records of the trial court.”); (reviewing court may not consider issues “never .